Breaking News

“There is no scientific foundation to the concept of Vaccine Passports” according to huge group of Doctors from around the world

A GROUP of doctors say natural immunity to coronavirus infection is long lasting but fear people will be coerced into taking top-up vaccines in order to re-access society when their Digital Green Pass expires after just six months.

By Oliver May

Doctors for Covid Ethics, a group of doctors across Europe and North America, say studies on Covid-19’s closest-related virus to infect humans, SARS, revealed that those who had acquired natural immunity in 2003 remain protected even now. They also maintain that, even before the onset of vaccination campaigns, most people had become immune to Covid-19, either through infection with the virus itself, often without symptoms or with only mild, uncharacteristic ones, or due to cross-immunity conferred by other, naturally occurring coronaviruses.

But under an Article of Law Decree just published by the European Union, its proposed Digital Green Pass will have validity for just six months. Once this expires the holder would need to be re-vaccinated or have had Covid in the last six months or take a test every 48 hours in order to regain their freedoms.

Doctors for Covid Ethics argue there is no rational case for such a pass, which is currently being used in Israel and proposed in the UK, adding that immunity from infection is likely to be durable and unaffected by variants.

Doctors for Covid Ethics said: “There is no scientific foundation to the concept of vaccine passports and no rational case at all for vaccine passports. To set a six-month cut-off is bizarre and arbitrary. Examining the time course of antibodies in blood samples is not a valid approach to the question of, ‘how long does immunity last?’.

“This is because antibodies aren’t the most important host defence mechanism in immunity to viruses. That’s considered to be T-cell memory (cytotoxic as well as ‘helper’ lymphocytes) and B-memory (antibody producing) cells. Antibodies naturally fall over time if you’re no longer constantly rechallenged with the infective pathogen. As community prevalence falls away, this re-exposure to the virus also diminishes.

“When durability of immunity to the closest known virus, SARS, was studied, those who had acquired immunity naturally, through infection in 2003, all retained immunity 17 years later. There is speculation that ‘variants’ of SARS-CoV-2 might ‘break through’ the immunity gained through natural infection or vaccination. There is absolutely no evidence for this at all.

“In fact, there is very strong evidence to the contrary – that no variant is sufficiently different from the original virus that it’s even possible for ‘immune escape’ to occur. Several groups of immunologists have shown convincingly that people immune to one variant have T-cells which recognise all the other variants tested. This isn’t a surprise, for no variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3 per cent.

“In fact, those who had retained immunity to SARS also possessed cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2. These two viruses differ by approximately 20 per cent. Obviously, if our immune systems easily recognise two viruses which share 80 per cent similarity, it follows that differences of 0.3 per cent are completely irrelevant, from an immunological perspective.”

The group went on to add that focusing on antibodies in the context of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is “flawed” and so coercing people into so-called booster vaccines in order to regain their freedoms withdrawn by Governments is wholly inappropriate.

“The whole concept of antibody-based immunity against an air-borne pathogen is flawed because the antibodies are on the wrong side of the wall and cannot intercept viral entry into the respiratory tract epithelium,” added the group.

“Secreted IgA antibodies play no significant role either: selective IgA deficiency does not enhance susceptibility towards coronavirus infections.”

The group also highlights that vaccine companies have been exempt from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm, adding that, for the vast majority of people, SARS-CoV-2 is a non-lethal, typically mild to moderately severe illness. They said: “The overwhelming majority of people are not at risk from COVID-19 and do not require vaccination for their own protection.

“The vaccines have been touted as a means to prevent asymptomatic infection and, by extension, asymptomatic transmission. However, “asymptomatic transmission” is an artefact of invalid and unreliable PCR test procedures and interpretations, leading to high false-positive rates. Evidence indicates that PCR-positive, asymptomatic people are healthy false-positives, not carriers. A comprehensive study of 9,899,828 people in China found that asymptomatic individuals testing positive for COVID-19 never infected others.

“In contrast, the papers cited by the Centre for Disease Control to justify claims of asymptomatic transmission are based on hypothetical models, not empirical studies; they present assumptions and estimates rather than evidence. Preventing asymptomatic infection is not a viable rationale for promoting vaccination of the general population.”

They have written to MEP’s, putting them on notice that liability for adverse reactions to the vaccines will fall on them, should they vote for the Digital Green Pass, which was debated on Wednesday.

And last week, Doctors for Covid Ethics wrote their third letter to the European Medicines Agency, warning executive director Emer Cooke that cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) dominates the list of adverse reactions from the vaccines and is not as rare as the EMA suggests.


The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support


A Bishop’s Message for Australian Leaders: “If you see you cannot make a change and you see you cannot speak the truth, then respect yourself and resign”
In mid-August, Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel gave a sermon during which he …
Austria Makes Covid-19 Vaccines Mandatory for ALL Citizens, Those Who Refuse to Comply To Pay Steep Fines
Austria is planning to implement some of the harshest penalties for citizens …
New Study published by top British Biomedical Scientist proves the Covid-19 Fraud is a Crime against Humanity
During the last twenty months, we have been subjected to rules and …
Fully Vaccinated account for 9 in every 10 Covid-19 Deaths since August according to latest Official Data
Authorities are slowly tightening the noose again around the necks of the …
Germany Announces “Lockdown Of The Unvaccinated” In An Attempt To Force Vaccines On 12 Million People.
Today has been a very sad day in Germany when to the …
Study finds Covid Vaccines increase the risk of Heart Attack by 127%
A new scientific study suggests the mRNA Covid-19 injections increase the risk …
Top ICU Doctor Suspended After Suing Hospital For Banning Ivermectin and Other Covid Treatments
A top critical care physician who filed a lawsuit against Sentara Norfolk …
Texas Man With Natural Immunity Forced to Get Covid-19 Vaccine To Remain On Lung Transplant Waitlist, Dies After Second Moderna Shot
Pictured: Bobby Bolin, 49, and his wife Amy Bolin. A Texas man …
GM, Ford and Chrysler Refuses to Comply with Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate
Big three international automakers will not require their employees to comply with …

By Oliver May

Share this page to Telegram
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
7 months ago

[…] By Oliver May • THE DAILY EXPOSE • April 29, 2021 […]

dot
dot
7 months ago

would be good to check spelling before posting… this add to contemplation as to what then is written as being of a source not of true nature.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] By Oliver May • THE DAILY EXPOSE • April 29, 2021 […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Source: DailyExpose.co.uk […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] witch hunt is harmful and absolutely unnecessary. Legal challenges in various countries have begun. Doctors for Covid Ethics have come out strongly against any sort of “vaccine passport.” Among the vulnerable groups, […]

Lenka
Lenka
6 months ago

thank you for a great article. Just noticed Doctors4Covid Ethic’s amazing article on vaccines has been taken down??!! 🙁
COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy and Safety https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/covid-vaccines-necessity-efficacy-and-safety-b1d8bfbc9d2
Is there a way to publish it somewhere! I thought it was so clear, would be great to be able to share it further. I can’t see how to contact Doctors4covid ethics so commenting on here. Thank you.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] “There is no scientific foundation to the concept of Vaccine Passports” according to huge group … […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] “There is no scientific foundation to the concept of Vaccine Passports” according to huge group … […]