Breaking News

Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as low as MINUS 109%

Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to have a collective negative efficacy in everyone over the age of 30 in the UK as low as minus-eighty-six-percent. Today we can reveal that the latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency, which has recently replaced Public Health England, shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have a negative efficacy in everyone over the age of 30 in the UK as low as minus-one-hundred-and-nine-percent.

Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –

During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).

In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.

Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.

Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).

Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)

In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –

They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.

0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%

Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.

0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.

Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.

We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.

The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.

Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.

Table 2 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published October 7th 2021, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 36 and week 39 of 2021. It also shows the confirmed case rate among persons fully vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.

Pfizer had an equal amount of people who had been vaccinated, and had not been vaccinated in the ongoing clinical trial in order to calculate the effectiveness of their vaccine, so in order to calculate the real-world effectiveness all we have to do is perform the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency, which are as follows –

The efficacy of all available vaccines combined is as low as minus-109.1% within the 40-49 age group, and as high as minus-16% in the 30-39 age group.

This shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are making people more susceptible to catching Covid-19, rather than preventing cases of Covid-19 by the claimed 95%, and the fact the efficacy of the vaccines has now surpassed the minus-100% barrier in the 40 – 49 age group suggests that it has completely decimated their immune systems, at least when it comes to infection from the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus.

By combining the numbers provided for all age groups over the age of 30, we have been able to calculate an average vaccine effectiveness of minus-66.2%%, and we’re definitely seeing this in the number of confirmed cases by vaccination status.

Between week 37 and week 40 of 2021 there were 52,849 confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated over 30’s, 13,444 confirmed cases in the partly vaccinated over 30’s, and a frightening 265,474 confirmed cases in the fully vaccinated over 30’s.

The new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work, and actually make the recipients worse.

Read and Share – Deaths among teenagers have increased by up to 125% since they started getting the Covid-19 Vaccine’


The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support


Medical Tyranny: US State Oregon Considering PERMANENT Indoor Mask Mandate
Over in the United States, in Oregon, Governor Kate Brown is considering …
American Toxicologist Calls for An Immediate Halt to Covid Injections Due to Multiple Safety Concerns
“If all these gene therapies do is lessen the diseases, then they're …
Dr. Robert Malone: Mass Formation in The Context of WWII And Current Events
Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, …
Staffing Shortages at New York Jails Could Reach Dangerous Levels as Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate Deadline Passes
Prisons in New York City (NYC) are suffering a serious staffing shortage, …
Poland’s Nuremberg 2.0 Project Has Been Launched
Members of the Corona Investigative Committee, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer, …
Did German Chemist Dr. Andreas Noack Die After Direct Energy Weapon Attack?
Dr. Andreas Noack created a video exposing graphene hydroxide as an ingredient …
Millions of Lateral Flow Test Kits Sent out To Schoolchildren with Wrong Instructions
In the UK, the controversial lateral flow test kits have been sent …
We are moving towards a society where everything is prohibited unless it is specifically allowed
I hate clichés but they are popular and last for generations because …
Pfizer Documents Reveal: Both Pfizer and The FDA Knew The Risks of Vaccine Adverse Events and Deaths                           
A federal judge ordered that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) …
Share this page to Telegram
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
abrogard
abrogard
1 month ago

Just make it clear to me, please. If the Pfizer calculation for efficacy was not really legitimate. Then how really legitimate would be our claims for its negative efficacy if we use the same calculation?

And – second thing – I was educated online by I think Dr Chris Martensen’s youtube vid about Pfizer’s report to believe that in fact Pfizer’s figures showed an absolute efficiency of 99.96% to set against a normal ‘efficiency’ (of NOT getting bad covid/death) of 9986%.

Meaning, said Dr Chris, that Pfizer’s figures were actually showing an improvement of only 0.1% at best if you take their vaccine. That’s all you can hope for. Hardly worth bothering, hardly worth taking the risk of an untested thing.

But to get back to this article: how about the absolute ‘inefficiency’ then, of these figures now? What does that work out as?

I suppose it would be represented by a reduction in the 99.96% figure. Can some/will some mathematically literate person work that out for us?

Sarah
Sarah
Reply to  abrogard
1 month ago

99.86% rather than 9986%, and yes, Pfizer did fiddle the figures but if they used, during their Phases 1 and 2 Clinical Trials, a specific method of demonstrating efficacy and that exact same method can now be used, during this ongoing Phase 3 Clinical Trial, to demonstrate not just waning efficacy but actual increased risk of harm, that is significant.

bill
bill
Reply to  abrogard
1 month ago

Don’t forget that pisser has been fined billions going back decades for lying in their reports and trials. So all their figures are bull to begin with. And the same can be said of the government’s figures, since they’ve been saying that anyone who dies of anything at all died of ‘covid’. So what can you really get from all the numbers? Answer: nothing at all. If you want to understand what is happening, simply listen to the people that are being disabled and to the relatives of the dead. You could also listen to the non drug cartel doctors who are telling you about blood clots, destroyed immune systems, etc. Your chances of benefitting from the jab are 0. Your chances of death or ‘injury’ from the jab are X – make up whatever X you like, but it’s not 0.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  abrogard
1 month ago

With common sense: They never isolated the virus (lab made or natural) then how could they made a vax even with 0.1% effectiveness? There is not even a reliable test to detect it, then how could be a working vax? I mean, sorry, what is wrong with you discussing effectiveness? Based on what? Compared to what?

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 15, 2021Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 15, 2021Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as… […]

Corrado Roeper
Corrado Roeper
1 month ago

There is a difference between Table 2 that you show and the one shown in the October 7 Report. In the Report Table 2 is weeks 36-39, whereas yours is weeks 37-40. The results are similar, though.

Noralf Mork
Noralf Mork
1 month ago

When you comment on covid ‘cases’, have you taken into account that the PCR tests are deemed useless, showing too many false positives? And talking about covid ‘symptoms’ how do they know these are not simply flu symptoms? Flu has been counted as covid for over 20 months now!

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 15, 2021Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as… […]

GundelP
GundelP
1 month ago

What’s negative effectiveness? It’s a new-speak expression?
They are poisonous and do not give protection. = poisons.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 15, 2021Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the boost or degradation column above). The figures above indicate that, their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time). But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency. They progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination  For more see here. […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 15, 2021Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the boost or degradation column above). The figures above indicate that, their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time). But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency. They progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination  For more see here. […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as low as MINUS 109% (link). […]

Russell Haley
Russell Haley
1 month ago

https://principia-scientific.com/professor-dolores-cahill-people-will-start-dying-after-covid-vaccine/

What nobody seems to be realizing is that the efficiency was very high for a few months and then it not only goes to zero, the body will start to attack itself. This was well understood back in January if one reads the article above. Professor Cahill was told to shut up because she might scare people.

The current trends are following the exact trajectory that is described in the animal trials. I appreciate that the author is looking to track statistical evidence, but it’s like performing analysis on the skid marks leading up to a crash scene.

Sheila Sheppard
Sheila Sheppard
1 month ago

Can you please clarify where you are getting your immune system figures from? Thanks

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Per maggiori dettagli: Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a NEGATIVE effectiveness as… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the boost or degradation column above). The figures above indicate that, their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time). But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency. They progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination  For more see here. […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] A Pfizer originalmente reivindicou uma eficiência de 95% para sua vacina (calculada como na coluna de reforço ou degradação acima). Os números acima indicam que seus números podem muito bem estar corretos imediatamente após a vacinação (os grupos de idade mais jovens estão vacinados há menos tempo). Mas os números acima também mostram que as vacinas NÃO apenas perdem eficiência com o tempo, chegando à eficiência zero. Eles danificam progressivamente o sistema imunológico até que uma eficiência negativa seja alcançada. Atualmente, eles deixam qualquer pessoa com mais de 30 anos em uma posição pior do que antes da vacinação. Para mais informações, consulte aqui . […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the boost or degradation column above). The figures above indicate that, their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time). But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency. They progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination  For more see here. […]