|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Concerned parents have served a notice of liability to two NHS nurses in a school in England in relation to the vaccination of children with the Covid-19 injection.
The NHS nurses were in the school to give children the experimental Covid-19 injection and were willing to listen and discuss the concerns of the parents, even admitting they have no idea on the long term consequences of administering an experimental injection to children. However, the tune of the nurses soon changed after they were shown evidence the Covid-19 vaccine is harming and killing children and the concerned parents served the nurses with a notice of liability.
The nurses were informed that “if any harm comes to any child comes to any harm from this facility from a vaccination that has been administered here then you will be held personally liable” as they were served the notice of liability.
To which one of the NHS nurses took great offence and insisted she would not be held personally liable, before telling the parents that its for their child to decide if they will be having the Covid-19 jab due to the Gillick competent rule, and then telling an outright lie.
“Can I let you know now that the people who are in hospital with Covid-19 are those that haven’t had the vaccine.” said the defensive NHS nurse.
To which one of the concerned parents replied “No they’re not that’s an absolute lie.”
The people serving the papers were of course correct that the NHS nurse was lying to them. The latest data available from the UK Health Security Agency (formerly Public Health England) shows that 60% of those admitted to hospital with Covid-19 over the last four weeks were people who had been vaccinated.
According to the Vaccine Surveillance report published by the UKHSA on October 14th, between September 13th and October 10th 2021 2,250 unvaccinated people were admitted to hospital resulting in overnight inpatient admission, compared to 3,258 vaccinated people.
You can watch the full video of the NHS nurses being served notice of liability for any harm causes to children due to giving them an experimental Covid-19 injection they do not need…
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
We are being heavily censored. Please share this article…
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
[…] Source link […]
What, about this?
Former Pfizer VP: 0.84% ‘Clear evidence of fraud’ in Pfizer study claiming 95% efficacy
posted by Mordechai Sones September 30, 2021 10:58 am
America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon yesterday said there is “clear evidence of fraud” in the Pfizer study that purports to claim 95% efficacy in their COVID-19 “vaccine”.
Yeadon was commenting on an article appearing in The Lancet and critiquing a documentary that scrutinized a Pfizer efficacy study, calling the distinction raised therein between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction “accurate”.
The Lancet article, entitled COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room, says that although attention has focused on vaccine efficacy and comparing the reduction of the number of symptomatic cases, “fully understanding the efficacy and effectiveness of vaccines is less straightforward than it might seem. Depending on how the effect size is expressed, a quite different picture might emerge.”
The article continues: “Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines.
“However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”
“Pfizer reported that its vaccine showed a 95% efficacy,” explained the documentary, entitled COVID Shot or Not? “That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time. But that’s not actually what that number means.
“That 95% refers to the ‘relative risk reduction’ (RRR), but it doesn’t tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need ‘absolute risk reduction’ (ARR).
“In the Pfizer trial, 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the vaccine developed COVID-19. In the unvaccinated placebo group, 162 people out of 18,325 got it, which means that even without the vaccine, the risk of contracting COVID-19 was extremely low, at 0.88%, which the vaccine then reduced to 0.04%.
“So the net benefit, the absolute risk reduction, that you are being offered in the Pfizer vaccine in 0.84%
“That 95% number? That refers to the relative difference between the 0.88% and 0.04%. That’s what they call ‘95% relative risk reduction’. And relative risk reduction is well-known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using absolute risk reduction instead. Which begs the question: How many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines, had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit?”
In response, Dr. Yeadon said: “It’s worse, actually. In the Pfizer study from which the 95% claim comes, there’s clear evidence of fraud.
“Why do I say that? Well, a study which is properly blinded means neither the subject, the study director, nor any other actor knows what each patient has received.
“Patients in clinical trials are obligated to follow ‘the protocol’, which specifies must-dos & prohibitions.
“If it’s blind to the end, how could one group end up with five times as many subjects having their data pulled prior to statistical analysis in the test group compared with the control group?”
Yeadon expanded: “The story of how a large state within India solved its COVID-19 crisis is no surprise to those of us who’ve known since spring 2020 that our governments, media, and tech titans have been acting against our interests, both health as well as democratic.
“We’ve known, for example, that highly qualified physicians and scientists are well able to treat and save most people infected by SARS-CoV-2.
“The methodology is simple: Attack the virus and the inflammatory and ultimately thrombotic disease phases rationally by administering targeted, multi drug treatments.
“These include Vitamin C and Vitamin D but in particular, Ivermectin, zinc and a zinc ionophore such as one of several old antibiotics like azithromycin.
“Used in sequence depending on the presentation, in excess of 80% of patients avoid hospitalization anddeath, including in cohorts we regard as at high risk.
“Peter McCullough and colleagues have put themselves in harm’s way professionally in pressing home these simple messages.
“Two remarkable meta-analyses (the highest level of medical evidence, a review of randomized, controlled clinical trials), authored by Tess Laurie and Pierre Kory, show conclusively that if you could choose only one medical treatment, it would be ivermectin. It’s safe, we’ll-tolerated, off patent and cheap to make, yet HIGHLY effective as a treatment for COVID-19. Reviews by Tess Lawrie and Pierre Kory are in the most read papers this year.
“Yet not one major media channel has bothered to tell us this. Instead, they’ve lied about ‘horse deworming’ drugs and made false claims about safety.
“This is what Uttar Pradesh used in a few short weeks to crush soaring COVID-19 deaths in this large Indian state. They didn’t do much vaccination.
“Vaccination has, separately, been shown by Steve Kirsch’s team, to have resulted in a median estimate of 150,000 deaths shortly after vaccination in the U.S.A. alone.
“They made these calculations solely based on the publicly accessible database which collects adverse event reports, VAERS.
“Additionally, they used mechanistically plausible assessments of the most common, serious adverse events, finding for example that pulmonary embolism occurs at over 400 TIMES the rate observed after any other vaccine types since the database began operations a few decades ago.
“These novel technology gene-based agents cause our bodies to manufacture coronavirus spike proteins, and these alone are responsible for a substantial proportion of the adverse effects of being infected by the virus.
“What have our governments, media, and technology titans been doing in the meantime?
“Rubbishing the experts, attacking the publications, suppressing information everywhere, and banning accounts that persist in telling the truth.”
Echoing remarks by Zelenko Protocol discoverer Dr. Vladimir Ze’ev Zelenko, Yeadon continued: “Having done this for well over a year, I’m confident that their actions comprise deliberate mass murder. Their objective appears to be to keep people as fearful as possible and receptive to vaccination. All of these claims are supported by plentiful public sources.
“But the scandal of depriving people of effective treatments while coercing them into submission to dangerous vaccination is the worst thing that’s happened in the world for decades, arguably forever.”
Dr. Yeadon concluded, urging people to “see the true scale of the lie before injecting their children.”
The Lancet Study
Doctors for COVID Ethics
On The accompanying chart:
Pfizer/BioNtech RRR 95.03% ARR From Jab 0.84%
Moderna (NIH) RRR 94.08% ARR 1.24% From Jab
Janssen RRR 66.62% ARR 1.19% From Jab
Astrazeneca/ Oxford RRR 66.84% ARR 1.28% From Jab
The Lancet
Me: So you get a Pfizer shot and you are getting 0.84% Benefit in fighting Covid – down from 95% by just -94.16% chance of getting Covid – which begs the question, if vaccines are not for Covid then what are they really for – injecting Graphene Oxide and Nanobots and Lipid packages and mRNA, which probably does nothing at all – so what do you think of the facts, by Lancet, no less?
6.500 plus Doctors For Covid Ethics and The Lancet, can’t be wrong?
Serve another Notice of Liability to the facility and the one in charge. Keep serving the notice left and right….. Serve to Politicians, Police Department. Construction etc…etc…
This should have been initiated from the very beginning of the fear-mongering. I have had to sign a waiver in hospital, it should apply both ways. Well done to the parents.
[…] October 15, 2021NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they w… […]
[…] October 15, 2021NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they w… […]
While the MSM condemns the use of ivermectin, the most populated state in India just declared they are officially COVID free after promoting widespread use of the safe, proven medicine. In addition to this, Ivermectin attaches to covid spikes and prevents them from binding to ACE2. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://health.p0l.org/
Government altered the law last November to extend to administrators of the experimental, unlicensed gene therapy the immunity from prosecution for harm they extended to its manufacturers.
What do these notices achieve? Do they have any legal standing? Ive seen posts on social media of various groups serving notices to MPs, Public Figures etc etc who support the Vaxx.
Hi,
I too would like to know if these notices have any legal clout. I have looked online and cannot seem to find anything about it. If these people have taken legal advice and the notice has been written professionally then all power to them. I hope it works. If ,however, it is just a fear mongering exercise then the act is as bad as the fear mongering the Expose is calling the government out on and may even do more harm to the cause than good.
Of course they have no legal clout. The gov own the ‘justice’ system. Is Assange in jail? Yes. Is the pedo ‘royal’ in america in jail? No. Are any of the gov or the ‘health’ service or the drug cartels or any other rich person ever going to punished for any of this? Of course not. Ask yourself this: what would happen if some ‘judge’ got so stoned that they actually tried to punish one of your abusers? Next you’ll be asking if you have democratic rights. Britain is a hole, always has been and always will be.
There is no legal protection for fraudulent enterprises. There is tons of evidence to show this was planned by cabal and is even online Rockefeller lockstep plan written at least ten years ago. The whole thing is fraudulent. Yes the courts .. maritime law etc are totally corrupt but I think now the cabal like the MPs are getting frightened about the public knowing there is no justice to be had via the police who side with the corrupt lawyers and judges and cabal..will take the law into their own hands it happened before remember!
Boris saying they will have a parliamentary enquiry we know is a joke
If you look on bitchute prof Dolores Cahill shows the way to personally bankrupt people without using the courts or the police. Everybody needs to start doing it…to the police too..😀
excellent … nurses sitting there admitting they have no idea of the consequences of the experimental injection on kids who are being injected yet they have no qualms in administering the injection …they must be advised that they are individually now responisble for any negative or adverse reactions experienced by the injected and the family has legal recourse and indeed obligation to hold all those who administer experimental injections responsible for injury or death of loved ones ….if no one knows the possible deadly consequences of an experimental injection it cannot be administered under any, any circumstances and certainly not to kids in schools who are being encouraged to ignore any concerns their parents may have …… the govt must fall if this is allowed to continue
It’s a shame no one feels this way about the adults that are being murdered by the gov, but they don’t matter right? And congrats on being the one millionth person to claim that the gov will be overthrown, presumably by all the obese lager swilling football hooligans that make up 90% of the british public. Perhaps they’ll sit on them. Britain is a scummy hole, and always will be.
Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2021-10-15. Govt does not know best. Brit MP censored = rubicon. Jab boxes: July 2018. Jab signage: Jan 2020
https://paulthepaperbear.wordpress.com/2021/10/15/your-alternative-update-on-covid19-for-2021-10-15-govt-does-not-know-best-brit-mp-censored-rubicon-jab-boxes-july-2018-jab-signage-jan-2020/
[…] October 15, 2021NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they w… […]
[…] October 15, 2021NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they w… […]
[…] October 15, 2021NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they w… […]
[…] Puede ver el video completo de la situación con las enfermeras aquí. […]
[…] Puede ver el video completo de la situación con las enfermeras aquí. […]
Good who ever administers one of these should be held responsable if any harm is done its law numeburg code these have broken all 10 codes of the numeburg code. Time for a new numeburgcode and everyone involved be held resposable there r more then 23 people to be held responsable and over millions that have been injured or harmed by one of these
Every person giving jabs need to be shown videos of medical staff and doctors and nurses as well as professors etc being given judgement and executed during nuremburg trials for experimenting on people without their informed consent.
No child or even adult can give informed consent as the inserts that come with the jab they call a vaccine are left intentionally blank so no one and certainly not the NHS know what is in the drugs they dish out .
No one would get a jab knowing that they will be genetically modified for life…no longer fully human. No one would consent to the jab knowing that a baby girl had her kidneys cut out while she was alive …no painkillers or anaesthetic allowed as they need viable organs to produce the jabs
Pfizer has been caught through a whistleblower who worked at Pfizer and went to project Veritas showing emails saying they did not want the public to become aware they used aborted fetuses to produce vaccine. All of them were using aborted fetal cells IN their vaccines and hid their use under codes. HEK followed by the number they had reached in aborted viable babies for Pfizer.
You need to know that if you have agreed to have your organs removed the same process will happen to you. They paralyse the body but no anesthesia or other painkillers allowed as it would damage organs. Oh yes they say you are brain dead which is more than they say about the babies born or aborted to have organs removed.
The criteria for brain dead has been altered a great deal on the lax side….after all NHS gets thousands for a kidney or a heart etc….relatives have had to fight to stop loved ones being declared brain dead and insisted they be treated and they have recovered. How many believed what the medics said and allowed organs to be taken and the loved one unable to scream?
So now we have the situation of universities requesting beating baby hearts…or a head…if you think this is fantasy…. research…I only wish it was. Even an arm has a price.
In USA undercover reporters who filmed discussions on organs and parts being ordered and the cost of each one was actually taken to court for filming it and the reporters were fined millions!! Barbaric… unbelievable!!! But true. Look it up. The fight Planned Parenthood are mounting to keep this lucrative trade alive and the corruption of judges is enough to convince anyone that the industrial medical complex that began under the Rockefeller and Rothschilds with help from Carnegie another eugenicists cabal bloodline has for the last hundred years set out to destroy medicine and humanity. if you were not aware bill gates is Rockefeller and his now ex-wife Rothschilds. Lord PIRbright a Rothschild holds the patent..or rather bioweapon as it is a manmade thing..and Richard Rothschild holds the patent for track and trace…cosy isn’t it?
Now on sage of quay blog there are videos of medical professionals showing parasites that are also in the jabs.
John Hopkins university said that examining blue masks under a microscope revealed something that looked like black thread but was alive and moving . I saw the videos of this. Also on the swabs they insist on shoving up people’s noses. This procedure is not necessary a mouth swab could be taken. …is it to deposit parasites up into the brain?
Parasites cause cancer through their actions on cells…also schizophrenia and other illnesses…do some research. This is why you can’t get ivermectin or hydroxychloraquin or other parasite cleansers now.
You can catch parasites from touching a door handle that someone with parasites have touched. We all used to have regular parasites cleanses but big pharma stopped all that. Only animals get parasites cleanses not us. Do some research..there are natura cleansers still available. l
[…] NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they were there to administer at UK School (link). […]
[…] San Francisco In-N-Out was forced to close after refusing to enforce vaccination checks. NHS nurses were served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the COVID-19 “vaccine” they aimed to administer at […]