Latest News

INVESTIGATION – Official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome by the end of the year

The last 7 Public Health England / UK Health Security Agency ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ report figures on Covid-19 cases show that double vaccinated 40-79 year-olds have now lost lost 50% of their immune system capability and are consistently losing a further 5% every week (between 3.9% and 8.8%).

Projections therefore suggest that 40-79 year-olds will have zero Covid / Viral defence at best, or a form of vaccine mediated acquired immunodeficiency syndrome at worst, by Christmas and all double vaccinated people over 30 will have completely lost that part of their immune system which deals with Covid-19 within the next 13 weeks.


By a concerned reader


The 7 Public Health England (PHE) / UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) tables below from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance reports of all fully genome sequenced Delta variant cases, separated by 6 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune response of the double vaccinated. PHE / UKHSA have done so much great work and are continuing to paint an extremely clear picture.

Weekly Decline in Double Vaccinated Immune System Performance compared to Unvaccinated People

Vaccine effectiveness is measured using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula –

(Unvaccinated case rate – Vaccinated case rate / the Larger of Unvaxxed or Vaxxed case rate)

We are using the normalised absolute ratio of vaxxed to unvaxxed case numbers to determine vaccine efficiency just as Pfizer itself does.

A Vaccine effictiveness of +50% means that double vaccinated people are 50% more protected from Covid than unvaccinated people. It means that the Delta case rate in the vaccinated is half the Delta case rate in the unvaccinated. 

A Vaccine effectiveness of -50% means that unvaccinated people are 50% more protected from Covid than double vaccinated people. It means that the Delta case rate in the vaccinated is double the Delta case rate in the unvaccinated. 

A Vaccine effectiveness of 0% means that doubly vaccinated people are 0% more protected from Covid than unvaccinated people. It means that the Delta case rate in the vaxxed equals the Delta case rate in the unvaxxed. It means the vaccines have lost all their effectiveness.

Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (certainly for Covid and most likely for viruses and certain cancers – following the evidence from Cole Diagnostics in Idaho and Dr Nathan Thompson and Dr Ralph Baric) within 13 weeks. 

Double vaccinated 30-49 year olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then have no immune defence to Covid at all. The question then becomes how much of the immune system is involved in defending against Covid? The worst case scenario is that they effectively have full blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS.

Unless a cure is found quickly they may well die (as occurred at the start of the AIDS epidemic).

“In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated”. – PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 41.

“There is the potential for ADE, but the bigger problem is probably Th2 immunopathology,” says Ralph Baric, an epidemiologist and expert in coronaviruses—named for the crown-shaped spike they use to enter human cells—at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

In previous studies of SARS, aged mice were found to have particularly high risks of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology in which a faulty T cell response triggers allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes, activating the complement system and potentially damaging the airways.”.

Baric expresses his concern about what that might mean for use of a COVID-19 vaccine in elderly people. “Of course, the elderly are our most vulnerable population,” he adds. – https://www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8218  (the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA)

The underlined passage (which has been redacted from the online PNAS report – but is in many other online copies – https://principia-scientific.com/study-covid-19-vaccine-can-destroy-your-immune-system/) is critical as it relates to an immune deficiency in killer T cells.

Dr Baric should know because in 2002 on April 19, the University of North Carolina filed US patent 7279327 for an infectious replication defective coronavirus (to be used as a virus vector for an HIV vaccine), claiming priority from US28531801P. Inventors were: Kristopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, Ralph S. Baric

This was seen by Dr Ryan Cole who was trained at the Mayo Clinic and runs the largest Independent testing lab in Idaho – USA. Dr Cole has done over 100,000 pathology lab examinations from Covid patients. He identified what he is seeing as a form of AIDS (reverse HIV he called it – where you lose CD8 killer T cells rather than CD4 Helper T cells).

These immune system degradations could be caused by ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement – where the vaccine induced antibodies start working in reverse) and be specific to Covid, or could be more general and result in a form of vaccine mediated AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). Baric suspects the latter above. The fact that the 3rd Jabs worked in Israel (for a short period of time before the 4th jabs were proposed) means that vaccine antibodies do still have a protective effect immediately after vaccination. So that rules out ADE.

The falling efficacy of the vaccines does not asymptotically approach zero (which would mean that vaccines merely lose effectiveness over time). It goes straight through zero and then goes dangerously negative (which means the vaccines become toxic to the immune system). Then it becomes increasingly negative in a linear manner week on week. If this continues then the vaccines will completely destroy the part of your immune system which deals with Covid by the end of January. 

This may well result in more cases of Shingles, HPV, Herpes, Epstein Barr, Endometriosis and other viral infections – https://www.nbc12.com/2021/10/15/reports-shingles-outbreaks-not-directly-linked-covid-19-vaccine/ 

HARRISONBURG, Va. (WHSV) – There have been case studies showing people are experiencing recurrences or outbreaks of shingles after getting the COVID-19 vaccine. Local doctors say that is rare and not necessarily caused by the vaccine.
“I’ve seen a lot of shingles recently, but I haven’t seen it associated with the vaccine personally. That’s my personal experience,” Dr. Jennifer Derby, a family physician with Sentara RMH, said. (2021October15)

The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves, because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different. So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of AIDS (after an initial few months of effectiveness). The risk benefit analysis for these vaccines has now become a risk detriment analysis for everyone over 30.

Table 2. COVID-19 Cases by Vaccination Status

The immune system boost or degradation column, which is the vaccine efficiency/inefficiency column, column10, is calculated from Pfizer’s vaccine efficiency formula of
U-V/U for U>V
U-V/V for V>U
which formula they used to claim 95% vaccine efficiency against Wuhan alpha.

Cases reported by specimen date between week 32 and week 35 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf 

Cases reported by specimen date between week 33 and week 36 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018416/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_37_v2.pdf 

Cases reported by specimen date between week 34 and week 37 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1019992/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_38.pdf 

Cases reported by specimen date between week 36 and week 39 2021 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf 

Cases reported by specimen date between week 37 and week 40 2021 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1025358/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-41.pdf 

Cases reported by specimen date between week 38 and week 41 2021 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf 

If the case numbers of the vaccinated simply converged and met up with the case numbers of the unvaccinated then the vaccine would have merely lost its effectiveness and the tables would all be green and the vaccine efficiency would be ZERO.

But that did not happen. The vaccinated case numbers are now twice the unvaccinated case numbers per 100k people, and the tables have all gone red.

That means the vaccine have not merely lost their efficiency. They have not merely stopped working. They are still very much working. But they are working against your immune system rather than for it. They are suppressing your immune response. They are damaging your immune system. They are causing it for become worse than if you had not taken the vaccine. They are toxic to your immune system. They are not merely ineffective. They are negatively effective.

The inescapable immunological conclusion from this data is that the case rate being higher in the vaccinated means that the immune system is lower in the vaccinated.

This suggests that the vaccines are damaging the immune response, which in turn suggests that the vaccines are damaging the immune system, therefore making the immune system deficient.

This suggests that the vaccines are giving people vaccine mediated immune deficiency, which therefore suggests the vaccines are giving people a form of AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome).

What is so remarkable is the speed and the consistency of the immunological degradation. 

Choosing your Formula

The Immune System boost/degradation column is a measure of the boost or damage to your immune system – see report

The Vaccine Efficacy % for double vaccinated column shows how much more or less resistant to Covid the double vaccinated are than the unvaccinated – see report

So if you are 40 years old and double vaccinated then your immune response is now degraded by 55.4%. This means that unvaccinated 40 year olds are 55.4% less likely to catch Covid than the doubly vaccinated. Whilst double vaccinated 40 year olds are 124% more likely to catch Covid than the unvaccinated.

You can look at it either way. It just depends whether your chosen parameter is the doubly vaccinated or the unvaccinated. But whichever one you choose, the outlook this winter for those who have been fully vaccinated with the experimental Covid-19 injections looks terrible.


The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support


Medical Tyranny: US State Oregon Considering PERMANENT Indoor Mask Mandate
Over in the United States, in Oregon, Governor Kate Brown is considering …
American Toxicologist Calls for An Immediate Halt to Covid Injections Due to Multiple Safety Concerns
“If all these gene therapies do is lessen the diseases, then they're …
Dr. Robert Malone: Mass Formation in The Context of WWII And Current Events
Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, …
Staffing Shortages at New York Jails Could Reach Dangerous Levels as Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate Deadline Passes
Prisons in New York City (NYC) are suffering a serious staffing shortage, …
Poland’s Nuremberg 2.0 Project Has Been Launched
Members of the Corona Investigative Committee, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer, …
Did German Chemist Dr. Andreas Noack Die After Direct Energy Weapon Attack?
Dr. Andreas Noack created a video exposing graphene hydroxide as an ingredient …
Millions of Lateral Flow Test Kits Sent out To Schoolchildren with Wrong Instructions
In the UK, the controversial lateral flow test kits have been sent …
We are moving towards a society where everything is prohibited unless it is specifically allowed
I hate clichés but they are popular and last for generations because …
Pfizer Documents Reveal: Both Pfizer and The FDA Knew The Risks of Vaccine Adverse Events and Deaths                           
A federal judge ordered that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) …

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Latest News

4.3 14 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
105 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dnomsed
dnomsed
1 month ago

Excellent review. Thank you very much.

Shocking findings for the vaxxed – vaccine induced Aids.

Socrate
Socrate
Reply to  dnomsed
1 month ago

How can you believe the lies told by this shitty site? I mean, will the few billion vaccinated people all get AIDS? Ha, ha, what a ridiculous lie!

pfwag
pfwag
Reply to  Socrate
1 month ago

and with any luck you will be one of them so you can give us an updated, firsthand report

Edmund Roache
Edmund Roache
Reply to  Socrate
1 month ago

Wait and see. If it is true, then the authorities will tell you, you are dying from a new virus, not their vaccine. The real problem is that you can’t figure ourt who is lying and who is not, when it is quite easy to do so. Those who do not live by the truth and love the truth—can’t seem to find it.

Ev555
Ev555
Reply to  Edmund Roache
1 month ago

They already have a name for the new one, Marburg

winni
winni
Reply to  Ev555
29 days ago

Small pox is coming soon, according to Bill Gates

Hank
Hank
Reply to  Edmund Roache
1 month ago

They will blame ANY death on the ‘unvaccinated”. Do you think these people are going to quit cheating and lying when it comes to a TRILLION DOLLAR market. Big Pharma never has and it also is free from liability, so the killing fields are wide open for these monsters! We have NO LAWS in this nation, the land of the “free”, to hold Big Pharma accountable and if politicians want to go on “leading” they better come up with something to hold BG accountable for its many crimes against humanity!

Ev555
Ev555
Reply to  Socrate
1 month ago

Maybe not all with aids, but whoever was foolish to have fallen for it will surely be in great peril likely resulting in death. If you’ve taken it your best bet is to fall down on your knees and cry out to Jesus.

Last edited 1 month ago by Ev555
Hank
Hank
Reply to  Socrate
1 month ago

Lies? Are you a doctor? What difference does it make if these “vaccines” have already killed and injured MILLIONS? Now we have to wait to see if they get stripped of their natural immunity? Naivete kills! people in this world just can’t get themselves to believe that “authorities” would commit a crime like this! The Big Lie.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Socrate
1 month ago

You can’t read, right ?

“OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT REPORTS SUGGEST”

winni
winni
Reply to  Socrate
29 days ago

I guess that the ones who will get Aids are the ones who took the Pfizer. The reason I believe so is coz most of the ones who took the real thing(not Placebo or Saline) are getting side effects in their private parts including women having irregular mens and some having miscarriage

Ima Sceptic
Ima Sceptic
1 month ago

This is an incorrect assumption “ The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves, because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different.”
The ingredients are largely undisclosed, trials are undertaken by the manufacturers not the authorities and approvals have been given without scrutiny or qualification based on the manufacturers claimed results.

Wait a sec...
Wait a sec...
Reply to  Ima Sceptic
1 month ago

I think that’s taken from the news release that this child’s “vaccine” is going to be a 1/3rd dose of the standard adult shot, I saw that maybe a week ago. So there’s a basis for their leap of logic.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
1 month ago

Well, it seems to me that this “secret meeting” recording, was valid: CHINA COMMUNIST PARTY BOSSES DISCUSS VACCINE IMPACT ON USA MILITARY FORCES SAY: “EVERYONE WHO TOOK THE VACCINE IS DEAD”
By Edward Morgan October 21, 2021
A horrifying video conference (video below) from inside China has been intercepted by intelligence sources and in it, bosses from the China Communist Party (CCP) discuss the future of the United States after distribution of the vaccine: “Everyone who took the vaccine is dead” they say.
The leaked segment of the intercepted video conference begins with the CCP Boss who organized the video conference telling the other CCP participants “What the CCP wants most is to have U.S. Troops get vaccinated.”
The speaker goes on to say “Once they get vaccinated, the U.S. Military will collapse, and the CCP will triumph.”
The conversation continues with the primary speaker saying “After the U.S. Troops are vaccinated, I tell you, the vaccination against the CCP virus will basically be near the end.”
It continues “When the U.S. elite society, because of fear, fear of death, lack of faith, and because these rogue, low-level politicians, opportunists, meant to evade responsibility; especially when the Wall Street, Hollywood celebrities, the White House, and the troops are vaccinated, I can assure you there will be no vaccination issue.”
It goes on “The people who are implementing the vaccination are soon to be finished. Those who are pushing the vaccination behind the scenes, will likely have achieved their goals.”
Then shockingly in the same video, below, they talk about . . . AN ANTIDOTE?!?!?!?
“Vaccination will no longer be pushed and the ANTIDOTE will be certainly offered.”
At this point, one of the video conference participants, shocked, interrupts and asks “The antidote will pop-up?” and another comes in asking “What is the Antidote for?”
The main video conference speaker replies “It’s not to heal the damage brought by the vaccines, it’s to prevent you from transmitting the virus, instead of a remedy for the vaccines.”
He then delivers the blunt facts: “Those who were vaccinated are sentenced to death. The antidote for the vaccines is still in the hands of the CCP. Since the CCP wants (you) to die, how would they offer the antidote to you, the Lao Baixing of China?”
The leaked segment abruptly ends there.
The leaked video intercept was made public by Jarome Bell.
Republican Jarome Bell, is running in Virginia’s second congressional district. He tweeted Friday, “Audit all 50 states. Arrest all involved. Try all involved. Convict all involved. Execute all involved. #MaricopaCountyFraud.”
Bell, who served in the Navy as a chief petty officer for 27 years, is running as a conservative “America First” candidate in the suburban swing district encompassing the Virginia Beach area, according to his campaign’s website. Democrat Elaine Luria currently represented the district.
Bell uploaded the video to Twitter. Literally within minutes of revealing the intercepted video conference from inside China, Bell’s Twitter account was permanently suspended.
An intelligence contact within Twitter was able to access the account from inside Twitter, and screen capture the tweet and video, sending that to us covertly.
PrepareForChange
Not just US Military but “everyone” will die

BRIAN L BURNS
BRIAN L BURNS
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 month ago

Link?

mvrentchler
mvrentchler
Reply to  BRIAN L BURNS
1 month ago

I had saved the video …intercepted Chin* video ….the vaccinated are dead
However, checking my posts to my MeWe page I’m unable to locate it now to provide the web address.
I also checked the Internet Archive Wayback Machine and it is not there possibly because it is relatively new and not yet archived for October 2021. The video itself may have been an earlier date I don’t recall.
It was translated from Chinese.

Last edited 1 month ago by mvrentchler
Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  mvrentchler
1 month ago
Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
1 month ago

This looks like the transcript:
https://choosing-him.blogspot.com/2021/10/everyone-who-took-vaccine-is-dead.html

Any truth in this do you think? Looks fishy to me I must admit.

suspiciouscatlady
suspiciouscatlady
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
7 days ago

smells fishy, even my schizo cat thinks so

baboon
baboon
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 month ago

Thanks Richard. This is nightmare fuel. I have been predicting EXACTLY what you wrote since April. As soon as I realized that the militaries of the West would be mandated (and baring in mind the spike protein sequence was given BY CHINA to Big Pharma – a Trojan Horse) I knew that something was very, very wrong.

My hypothesis is that a new bioweapon will be released that binds with the vaxx antibodies, causing guaranteed ADE. But since we are in a science-fiction novel where we can make viruses on computers, who knows what the mechanism will be?

The link is here: https://prepareforchange.net/2021/10/21/china-communist-party-bosses-discuss-vaccine-impact-on-usa-military-forces-say-everyone-who-took-the-vaccine-is-dead/

suspiciouscatlady
suspiciouscatlady
Reply to  Richard Noakes
7 days ago

I fell for the first fake news, not gonna do it again. The first one claimed that Bill Gates had been arrested by the FBI for his role in all this. Come to find out, it never happened. Then there was another (non main stream media) planted story about Gates which also wasn’t true.

I suspect the opposition is trying to muddy the waters, and have us screaming to our friends about things which aren’t true so we look like loons.

Anyway, about this one. Maybe the chinese planned this all by themselves, maybe they didn’t. We will eventually find out the truth. Seems more likely however, that many of the US and global elites were in on this as well. Fauci and Gates for sure. <They both need to be hung for treason and crimes against humanity. And toss in the wives as well, I’m tired of these bimbos getting to massively profit from what their husbands did, and then magically accruing no punishment. Melinda was right there for years, helping Bill with his vile plans.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
1 month ago

Of course, when all of the parents of kids have died from the vaccines, “They” don’t want packs of young kids running around like packs of wild dogs, so terminate that problem at source and problem solved.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
1 month ago

Shocking findings for the vaxxed – vaccine induced Aids.

AIDS = Asshole Infected Death Sentence

JSG
JSG
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 month ago

I think what you meant to say was “Ass Injected Death Syndrome”

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 23, 2021INVESTIGATION – Official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired Imm… […]

Carmel
Carmel
1 month ago
Tanya gibbs
Tanya gibbs
1 month ago

So theyre3giving people AIDS?

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Tanya gibbs
1 month ago

They are not just vaccines. They are progressive immune system disruptors.

Last edited 1 month ago by Lords Witnesses
Maddie C
Maddie C
1 month ago

This article is extremely dangerous for readers and is insulting to assume that people reading this are so uneducated. In this article the author uses an argument of “fact 1 is true,” “fact 2” is true so there for… this statement 3 must also be true! In which case fact 1 is the vaccine helps induce immunity to covid, fact 2 AIDS is a disease in which the body has low general immune system so there for statement 3: the vaccine causes AIDS. This is simply so flawed. People make health care decisions off stuff like this which is dangerous to peoples lives! Its people who aren’t educated on true science further at a socioeconomic disadvantage because they trust this news source instead of consulting their doctors. Getting a vaccine is completely up to that person but when their decisions are based off untrue info it’s detrimental to their well being. Just ask your doctor if getting the vaccine is right for you. What they say is just a suggestion. They aren’t out to get you but a news source is a business that wants clicks and reads for popularity. Totally ok for a business! But please readers do not make your healthcare decisions based off these types of sources! It’s headlines like this that get clicks so of course they put effort into constructing these types of articles totally valid for a business. But not for your healthcare decisions. Doctors get paid for giving advice what you do with that it’s up to you but their interest is in being correct not getting clicks.

dave edmonds
dave edmonds
Reply to  Maddie C
1 month ago

why ask doctor if vaccine is right for you? of course it is , don’t forget docs get a kick back.

Maddie C
Maddie C
Reply to  dave edmonds
1 month ago

If you feel your doctor is being swayed in any way by financial or other incentives then that is unethical and illegal. You can bring that concern up to the ethical committee at you local hospital to take legal action or you local law enforcement for malpractice. Doctors are present simply to give advice on how what you put in your body works for you. A doctor has years of training at understanding the chemical and biological make up of the human body and how outside substances affect it (medications, vitamins, vaccines etc). Just because a doctor isn’t the one directly giving you a vaccine it doesn’t mean that they don’t have training in how it will affect your body. For reference I suggest Chapter 6 of the book Pathological basis of disease by Robbins and Cotran 9th edition which details some of the basis for immunology courses that doctors are required to be well versed in for their board exams, specifically on diseases of the immune system. Another good source is the book Basic immunology by Abba, Lichtman and Pillai. You will see that the information rigorously studied by doctors about how the human immune system functions is quiet extensive. Asking a doctor about what is right for your body is important because they take into account your individual body and what risk factors you have with vaccine side effects. Asking your doctor will help with balancing the pros and cons the vaccine side effects and purpose has for you.

Steven
Steven
Reply to  Maddie C
1 month ago

We know your heart is in the right place, but wake up.
The evidence is all around and like a jigsaw, take a little time to put it together

xtuartb
xtuartb
Reply to  Steven
1 month ago

When the truth is too horrible to contemplate, many people will prefer to believe a comforting lie. With the vaccinated, the horror becomes personal, and all the more difficult to acknowledge. Commitment bias is upstream of, and more powerful than, confirmation bias. We have seen this time and again in cultic behaviour, and the fact that an entire official, global, culture has been implemented based on a series of lies only makes it more pervasive and controlling – it remains the same in essence.

Jane
Jane
Reply to  Maddie C
1 month ago

You really are naive. Most Doctors are NOT there to practice medicine they’re there for the money (kick backs) etc,
Most doctors are supporting this mass genocide and crimes against humanity.
Why don’t you read and educate yourself on what intelligent caring educated and world renowned virologists and researchers tell us

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Maddie C
1 month ago

I do not work for the Expose. I wrote the article. I have zero fincancial motivation. In fact it costs me my time which I put in for nothing. I did cell biology at Cambridge and then changed course and got a 1st in Mathemics from that university. Your post is speculative slander. And you are the one insulting people whom you regard or assume are uneducated. What qualifications to you have? I guess not a PhD in logic. The argumentation is valid to prove a vaccine aquired immune defiency. It does not prove HIV AIDS, neither does it seek to prove HIV AIDS. The suggested mechanism is a reduction in CD8 Killer T cells more than in CD4 Helper T cells (the cause of HIV). Having done Cell Biology I know for fact that these vaccines are Persistent Gene Therapy. How many people who have been vaccinated are aware of that? People are being vaccinated by Chemists not by Doctors. And Doctors are the one’s who are paid to practice their trade not researchers like me. How many doctors told the recipients of the jab that it was Gene Therapy? How many permitted vaccination without properly informed consent? Doctors who have come out against vaccination and have themselves refused vaccination have been told that they will lose their jobs, like the care home staff. How can they possibly give independent or trustworthy medical advice under that degree of financial coercion? Their entire earning capacity is dependent upon them becoming vaccinated. They could not be more compromised.

Last edited 1 month ago by Lords Witnesses
Garth
Garth
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Thanks for the article and analysis. This is rather concerning!
However, I find it curious that the death rate is still lower in those who have received double vaccination compared to the unvaccinated, despite their higher infection rate. Would we expect that to reverse at some point? I confess to knowing nothing about the immune system, but my gut feel is that if the vaccines are degrading immune systems, we should expect death rates among the vaccinated to start climbing.
Thanks again.

Ryan D
Ryan D
Reply to  Garth
1 month ago

Yes agree – lots of ‘what ifs’, including an amendment to the definition of ‘vaccination’ in Israel (booster, not the initial two), changes to the reporting circumstances (e.g. govt is more willing to note a person has died of Covid if they are found to have Covid but have died from other reasons), and quickly ruling out a vaccine related death if another co-morbidity was present etc. Unfortunately the analysis is entirely based upon a doctors professional opinion or the govt official who has to evaluate said analysis or conclusion. Doctors here in NZ complain about the 45 minutes or so it takes to write up a vaccine adverse event and don’t always do this as a result. I appreciate the data that expose brings, but I don’t always agree with their conclusions. End of Feb will be a key time to analyse the relevant information, as ADE and AIDS (equiv) would likely have had its full opportunity post Winter to demonstrate itself (or not).

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Ryan D
1 month ago

Agree, winter will reveal something. I hope it’s not what it looks like.
In Australia it’s up to the patient to report the adverse event. Doctors never tell the patient. I personally know of several quite severe reactions, and not one has actually been reported.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Garth
1 month ago

Good point. Your gut feeling is correct. It has been known for 2 months now (even articulated by Fauci) that the vaccines do not decrease the viral load, Since all vaccines can do (positively) is lower or raise viral load, it is hard to understand why the death rates are better among the vaccinated. The vaxxed death rates in the latest report for week 42 are 3x-6x lower in the doubly vaxxed than in the unvaxxed. Here is the reason in my opinion. I wrote to PHE, the NHS, Sir Patrick Vallance, Sajid Javid etc. just after the June21 PHE technical briefing came out which had the genetically sequenced delta deaths as follows.

June15-21: 4 unvaxxed deaths to 24 vaxxed deaths >50s
the total unvaxxed deaths (over and under 50s) in the preceding weeks were 12 then 11 then 10 (these early figures were not split into under and over 50s). Whereas the total vaxxed deaths were 10, then 14, then 24. (Technical briefings 15-17). These delta death rates did not support vaccination. In fact the vaxxed death rate caught up with the unvaxxed death rate in the over 50s (who had been vaxxed for the longest amount of time) on June21.

Their response was to not answer my email (they had answered a previous email), and to stop producing the figures “there was an interruption to the data provided to PHE by NHS digital”. They restarted the figures 2 weeks later and ran them biweekly instead of weekly, and hey presto the over 50 death rates all of a sudden did support vaccination. That we now know is impossible because the vaccines can now clearly be seen to be getting worse over time not better. The trouble with their new figures was that they did not rig the under 50s which I had not complained about. And I was able to deduce the correct over 50s death rate from their under 50s death rate and that corrected version (calculated in two different ways) continued the trend of the previous 3 weeks, showing that death rates in the vaxxed from detal per capita were now worse than in the unvaxxed.

I don’t know how they do it – there are many ways – but they are rigging the death rates in my view. It is totally illogical as you have realised for a vaccine which has only one mode of operation (reducing or increasing viral load) to lose the battle for infections and yet win the battle for deaths. I am guessing that it is a simpler matter to move the deaths from one column to another than it is to move the case numbers because there are a hell of a lot more cases than there are deaths. But that is merely a guess.

Last edited 1 month ago by Lords Witnesses
Garth
Garth
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Thanks for the great answer.
I’ve been thinking about it. One explanation may be related to the mechanism of death in many cases. That is, many die because of a cytokine storm, which is an immune response. I wonder if a damaged immune system is incapable of killing someone like that?
Another explanation may be fudging the data, either as you’ve suggested, or by by using “totals”. I’ve seen some analysis which suggests that the official figures for death rates are calculated using all the deaths since last December. So all that winter wave, when nobody was vaxxed, are counted to these figures thereby distorting the comparison. The situation reversed completely if you just looked at deaths since August (when there was actually a bit of an equilibrium in the Vax/unvaxxed).

xtuartb
xtuartb
Reply to  Garth
1 month ago

If the vaccinated are indeed becoming progressively (as individuals) more susceptible to a variety of viral illnesses, then hospitalisations and deaths would also become less and less attached to covid in the statistics. So far, we have seen little sign of excess mortality in the total-deaths-all-vauses series, but if this rises it would be a good indicator of immune-deficiency. The current emphasis on ‘flu may be a straw in the wind here – I can’t remember the actual name of the relevant UK committee, but there is one whose title (unexplained) includes ‘flu and covid reporting and handling explicitly.

Alex
Alex
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Also, did you see the raw data from Medicare that showed 48K deaths within 14 days of vaccination? The time period is key, because you aren’t considered “fully” vaccinated until after the 14 days. Therefore, those 48K deaths would have been recorded as unvaccinated.

Sheree
Sheree
Reply to  Garth
1 month ago

In Australia the number of deaths from vaccinations are higher than the number of deaths from covid.
And my understanding is that the number of deaths from vaccinations would be even higher if the were reported properly.
When a person is vaccinated, they aren’t considered to be vaccinated until 2 weeks thereafter. If they suffer any adverse reactions within that 2 week period, they are considered unvaccinated. Doctors and nursing staff are afraid to speak out and report properly. However, lots of people are speaking up from their personal experiences.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Sheree
1 month ago

I’m in Australia and I know it’s hard to get those numbers. I know several people who have been hospitalised after getting the jab. Some very severe. The hospital’s either tell them it’s not from the Vax (preposterous) or they tell them it’s probably from the Vax. Here’s the thing, in Australia the patient has to report the adverse event! Nobody ever tells them that. None of the reactions I know of personally have been reported.

John Cragar
John Cragar
Reply to  Garth
1 month ago

That is what we are waiting to see. If this data is accurate, and I pray it is not, then we are in big trouble. It asserts that we are losing t-cells and if that is the case we are going to see hospital runs that make the Spanish flu of 1919 look like a walk near a
sunny lake.

suspiciouscatlady
suspiciouscatlady
Reply to  Garth
7 days ago

A month later, you got your wish…

Maddie C
Maddie C
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Hello Lords Witnesses,
The article states it was authored “by Expose” hence why my argument is directed at the media company not you. However in response to your comment not finishing a cell bio degree at Cambridge is not something I would flex as a credential I’m sure you have extensive knowledge in math but this is not a mathematical topic. What my comment was about is that people reading these types of articles are making real health decisions and I simply meant my comment as a warning to ask your doctor first before making a decision of getting vaccinated by questioning the validity of this article which sites redacted sources and is posted on a media platform that doesn’t serve as an accurate source for Heath advice. I suggest if you would like to make a valid and respected review to publish it in a scientific journal which is a source that goes through rigorous vetting and review by scientist with real credentials. In any case there are some flawed connections in which you make these scientific claims. Note that in your comment you say the cause of hiv is reduction is CD8 and CD4+ tcells but infact HIV in itself is a virus that tricks the body into attacking its own immune system which is a side effect of having HIV not the CAUSE of HIV. As a result there is AIDS once the cell count gets low enough. One does not randomly contract HIV by attacking itself. It’s the decrease in these cells which makes an individual at risk to other infections. As with EBV another example of a virus that infects human host cells of the immune system. Please reference page 348 of Robbins (full text book in my above comment on the other reader) on infectious diseases for a touch up in this topic. Also I am not claiming that this is an HIV AIDS because hiv is a virus that infects the immune system cells I’m not sure why you referenced that in your comment? First, people have been receiving the vaccine for a while now so if this were true there would be the AIDS you claim caused by the vaccine number to be increasing in a step wise fashion not suddenly at the end of year like the article title suggests. Other aids are seen with leukemia’s, organ transplant immunosuppressive drugs, and stem cell transplants because decreasing the immune system response so that the body doesn’t attack say a new organ as a foreign object in the case of a transplant with different antigens is necessary (this is just an example). What you are insinuating is the that the covid vaccine has the like of a live attenuated virus that infects our own cells enough for our body to recognize that and attack our own immune system cells is to this strength on the immune system (literally anyone that can look up what the vaccine is knows this isn’t true). What is true is that the covid vaccine contains DNA for the spike protein which is a part of the COVId particle so that the body may make specific antibodies in recognition to the antigen of the SpIke protein so that in the case an individual is exposed the body recognizes the virus to target the immune system against it thus allowing for less viral shedding and not as bad symptoms for that individual. What you are suggesting is that the CD4+ and CD8+ cells that are made by the body to recognize the covid virus DNA are being confused into thinking our immune cells are made of the same DNA or have viral particles that the covid specific antibodies generated by our natural immune system and CD cells recognize to attack and thus killing our own immune system and down regulating an individuals immune system. If you do believe that the covid vaccine becomes ineffective over time there is no way to also believe it would remain in this amount of strength in our own bodies or is somehow toxic. I believe with your thought process you are confusing immunity to covid specifically as general immunity.with the numbers you claim to be negative with the immune system degradation you are saying ones entire immune system is down when in-fact the immunity acquired from being exposed to the antigen dna of the vaccine has fizzeled out, not the actually full immune system on an individual from a toxic side effect which you don’t go into any detail of this mechanism in your article. Just referenced as a vague way of the immune system just failing suddenly post vaccine. With this type of aids the person could literally died from being exposed to a pathogen with the strength of a common cold. I suggest reviewing this topic in the 2 text books I sited above and Essential Clinical Immunology by John Zabriskie which provide accurate information reviewed from a number of PHDs and MDs from Harvard and the university you claim to have attended, Cambridge. I also meant my original comment of this being insulting is that I feel insulted reading it! You assume that by throwing out a bunch of medical and science jargon on complement and viral injury to the immune system that I wouldn’t question such a flawed article (although I respect the effort!). I understand your point on the vaccine cohersion but that is outside the scope of the topic I’m debating specifically in this thread. However doctors are required to provide advice on the side effects. However the same can be said about researchers. A doctor is paid and legally obligated to give accurate advice on pathology and physiology, researchers can be paid through government subsidized grants to fund labs for various projects which I would argue can be seen as quiet suspicious. Although if you claim this is an unbiased and no conflict of interest in that financial source then the financial source of doctors must be as well. I believe that addressed each of your points. Again I just reiterate talking to YOUR doctor and not trusting randos on the internet including myself. I was sent this article by my boyfriend who asked me to review it for him since he didn’t know if it was a reliable source (I myself still have lots to review and learn on the topic but do so using reliable sources). I’ve never heard of this media page but felt strongly to share my thoughts in hopes that readers just consume this media with a grain of salt and talk to healthcare providers that they trust on these issues. That’s all.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Maddie C
1 month ago

The expose article says at the top after the two headline paras with massive space around it: “By a concerned reader”. I do not see how you could miss that ?!?!

You refer to Covid virus DNA. But the Covid virus does not have any DNA in it. It contains RNA. You do not appear to understand either my article or HIV. HIV AIDS results in a reduction actually the destruction of Helper T Cells not killer T cells. Whereas the vaccines reduce the numbers of killer T Cells – That was the finding of the Cole Diagnostics Path lab.

50 years ago I would agree with much of the sentiment in your response. In those days Doctor’s were trustworthy because they were independent from politics and controlled their hospitals in the UK. Today they is hardly a person in the UK that I know who has not lost a friend or relative to either gross medical negligence or to deliberate end of life over medication or both. The NHS used to be the best in the world when it was run by Doctors and the wards by the ward sisters. It is now certainly the worst in Europe. Today it is run by politically motivated pollticially active and politically appointed bureaucrats.

Let me be blunt with you. Medicine in my country is corrupt. Medicine in the US likewise. The only Doctor you can trust is the one who has been thrown out of his hospital for refusing to take the vaccine. Because he has acted medically not economically. And any doctor who permits his colleague to be thrown out of his job for refusing an experimental Gene therapy based on his personal medical judgement and his medical experience and remains working for and supporting that hospital knowing what it has done to his colleauge has done the opposite and therefore cannot be trusted and neither can the hospital itself. When you sack clinical staff for refusing an experimental (as regards medium term side effects) medication you break the hippocratic oath. You DO HARM to all the patients who are denied timely treatment as a result of the removed doctor. The Expose and actually some MSM outlets have reported whole ICU units being closed due to unvaxxed staff being sacked.

The govts in the UK and in the US are sacking care home and medical staff and denying treatment to sick patients as a result – and during a pandemic. It is inexcusable and it is very obvious proof that they do not care about the health of their citizens.

I know it is not an easy thing to accept that the govt is malevolent. And they were not nearly so malevolent in the past. But right now they are more malevolent than ever. Who ever heard of a politican prescribing a medication for a doctor? It should plainly be the other way around. You yourself argue that Doctor’s should advise. If so then do not listen to the dictates of politicians who are forcing a medication by law. And do not listen to doctor’s who agree to remain controlled by such govts.

xtuartb
xtuartb
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Thank you so much for writing such a clear and astute article. You have not gone beyond the data, and in using the pharmaceutical corporations’ own analytical methodology you draw for me an undeniable conclusion. I have followed the UK government bulletins daily for over 2 years now, and much of what is happening is being hidden in plain sight, only being released in accompaniment with pre-emptive and misleading interpretation.

The only rebuttal to your own conclusion would be based on the assertion that what has happened is simply too monstrous to be true. A few years ago I would have put it down to gross incompetence and greed, covered up by downstream self-protective lying. On multiple grounds of evidence, I no longer think this – the motivation is quite clearly population-reduction, whether this is for geo-political reasons or for some other and even more sinister reason.

In any case, motivated it certainly was, right from the start, and the urgent health consequences must be faced. Protecting ourselves against any further assaults will depend on motivational analysis, which is an equally urgent but parallel activity which needs to be cleared out from all the morass of disinformation currently swirling around on all sides.

Thank you again.

Last edited 1 month ago by xtuartb
YouAreALiar
YouAreALiar
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
6 days ago

Since you are so happy to drudge the name of Cambridge University, can I get your identity to cross reference this with them and confirm you’re not a lying piece of shit? Because I strongly suspect you are. If not you must have failed your degree at the very least.

Wait a sec...
Wait a sec...
Reply to  Maddie C
1 month ago

Yo, Maddie! My doc tried to guilt me into getting the Pfizer EUA shot by telling me his early teen daughter got it to protect her older teachers.

I didn’t buy it because I was forearmed with knowledge from many sources. This is my 1st time here, BTW.

2 days later a heart warning was slapped on the Pfizer vax. There’s now 2 separate warnings on the Pfizer IIRC.

Doctors can no longer be trusted to do what is right for their cattle I mean patients. They do what the NIH & CDC tell them to do.

Telling patients to only come to the ER when their lips turn blue is a recipe for death. Early treatment is critical. Remdesivir & intubation is deadly & not the way to treat Covid19 at all. India proves Ivermectin is THE way to fight C19.

10’s OF THOUSANDS of lives have been wasted by this nonsense approach to a bio-weapon cold. India proves Ivermectin is THE way to fight C19. Censorship is killing people daily.

The entire medical & scientific system is imploding. It is now a search for an individual doctor that is trustworthy that is key, as well as doing your own research to fact check them. Trust but verify.

Socrate
Socrate
1 month ago

This piece of shit named The Expose, is desperate about donations. This garbage should be closed for such miserable lies and its promoters handed over to prosecutors.

Last edited 1 month ago by Socrate
Pete
Pete
1 month ago

Thank you for the excellent article.

PatrioticDuty01
PatrioticDuty01
1 month ago

Ivermectin is approved for treatment against Covid-19 on the National Institutes of Health’s website. Right underneath remdesivir. Don’t believe me search covid19treatmentguidelines table-2e on your search engine and you will see it.
According to that website it was last updated July yet here these people are telling us in August not to take ivermectin.
Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://health.p0l.org/

Last edited 1 month ago by PatrioticDuty01
trackback
1 month ago

[…] Official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Synd… The vaccinated will hate the unvaccinated because they weren’t stupid enough to blindly obey like Fauci followers did […]

Eli Dumitru
Eli Dumitru
1 month ago

I followed the links to a number of the sources cited in this article and I didn’t find what this article was attributing to those sources. I searched for “Immune System” in those reports and it didn’t even show up. I didn’t see any charts with the red and green columns. The parts of those reports that I read were all saying that the vaccines were reducing hospitalization and death. If the author can help us actually find the evidence supporting the claims, that would be good.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Eli Dumitru
1 month ago

Yes. A Vaccine Surveillance Rerpot that does not mention the immune system which vaccines are supposed to train. That is because the government’s stated position is that the vaccines are safe and effective. But their own figures show for a fact that they are ineffective for everyone over 30 and you are safer in a room of unvaxxed people today than you are in a room of doubly vaxxed people. It cannot be the case that the infection rates are twice as high in the vaccinated but the death rates are 3x-6x lower can it? Because all a vaccine does is either increase or decrease the viral load, which would effect both similarly.

So one of their sets of numbers is wrong. I have been looking at case numbers and death rates since June. The death rates are wrong in my opinion. On June21 the vaxxed death rate for delta caught up with the unvaxxed death rate. That is when the PHE Technical Briefing figures (which were fine from Briefing 15-17) suddenly stopped for a week. Then they changed to be produced every 2 weeks rather than every week and magically the vaccine death rate compared to the unvaxxed death rate started improving as the vaccines themselves were becoming less effective.

PHE should have produced the vaccine efficiency percentages that I have done (in my coloured columns) and the Expose itself has done in the linked article. But they would show that the vaccines have lost efficiency and gone badly negative. That would defeat their stated position that Vaccines are safe and effective. So they do not produce those figures. But I am actualy capable of performing U-V/V on my calculator with their figures using Pfizer’s vaccine efficiency formula – which is just the normalised absolute rate ratio between the vaxxed (V) and the unvaxxed (U).

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Statistics which support the contention that the PHE Covid death rates are incorrect.

All cause mortality is consistent with the increase in illness/ cases.

https://www.normanfenton.com/post/comparing-age-adjusted-all-cause-mortality-rates-in-england-between-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
1 month ago

Prof Fenton actually says…Since 19 March the double dose vaccination mortality rate has increased week-on-week more or less consistently !

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 23, 2021INVESTIGATION – Official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired Imm… […]

Ev Mason
Ev Mason
1 month ago

There are parasites in the v@ccine. Polypodium Hydriforme to be precise. It was found by dr Carrie Madej at 400x magnification using a compound microscope. Hydra’s need to be stored at -70c to keep them viable, what temp did they say they had to ship the v@comes at? -70c

547CF361-5FDA-487C-BBCC-C73F1A2A4E88.jpeg
Ev Mason
Ev Mason
Reply to  Ev Mason
1 month ago

more info

F4B4C059-68BD-4459-BAF2-0CE487E23C9C.jpeg
Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
1 month ago

As there is no such thing as covid there is no such thing as immunity to it

trackback
1 month ago

[…] INVESTIGATION – Official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired… […]

Dayle
Dayle
1 month ago

I applaud your work and would like to believe this is true (well not really wishing deaths on people but you know what I mean I hope). Sadly, I believe that any biostatistician would have a field day pulling your calculations and conclusions to pieces. The confounding factors – for example, the jab not being effective against delta or other variants, the population health of the people first getting the jab, the lack of actual immunological response studies (blood tests showing decrease in immune response etc) need to be taken into account to support any claims made re weakening immunity in individuals. I do believe that the jab is deliberately harming people but only because I cant think of why else there is such a determination to force it on everyone, but don’t really think this is a sufficiently robust way to demonstrate it.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Dayle
1 month ago

I do understand what you mean! I am one of those bio statisticians to whom you refer. I agree that vaccine induced antibodies having been shown by Oxford in their Vietnam study to hve zero correlation to either viral load or symptom progression, which means they are effectively a placebo against delta is confounding to immune system damage IF the vaxxed case numbers equalled the unvaxxed. But they do not. They are way worse and getting progressively worse in a wonderfully consistent linear manner for all to see thanks to fantasic data from the gene sequencing guys at PHE. That tells us 2 things. Firstly that vaccine having helped the immune system fight Wuhan alpha, hinders the immune system in fighting delta and secondly the mechanism by which they hinder is increasing week by week in a linear manner. Now one has to think about the immunological meaning behind those numbers.

That is where a lot of people give up. For today doctors no longer think about the condition of their patients (because they do not have the time for one thing). So they do a series of tests and if the tests find nothing they say I cannot help you. That approach will not work here. Because nobody is going to fund the proper clinical tests into what these vaccines are really doing. what is needed is what Dr Nathan Thopson did with an immune function test before and after each jab and then a further test every month. Try getting the fudning for that from a hospital that fire people who refuse the vaccine.

So instead we have to use grey matter. What is the other linear response we have seen with these vaccines? Well the number of antibodies produced after the 2nd jab is linearly related to the time between the two jabs. One gets 4x as many for a 12 week gap and 18x as many for a 45 week gap as one gets for a 4 week gap. That shows that whatever the vaccine is doing it does it more and more each week in a linear manner. But we see that immune responses are deteriorating below that of the unvaxxed week on week in a linear manner as well. Therefore the vaccines are causing that linear progressive deterioration in immune response. A prolonged progressive deterioration in immune response is essentially AIDS.

It is not a giant leap of inordinate intellectual agility to see that if the vaxxed case numbers go negative something more than ‘losing efficiency’ is going on. Incidentally the ONS data on all cause mortality show the same progressive week on week rise for the double jabbed –
.
Since 19 March the double dose vaccination mortality rate has increased week-on-week more or less consistently. – Prof Norman Fenton – https://www.normanfenton.com/post/comparing-age-adjusted-all-cause-mortality-rates-in-england-between-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated

2vaxmortality.jpg
trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read more: INVESTIGATION – Official Government reports suggest the Fully Fake Vaccinated will develop Acquir… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] The Exposé on October 23, 2021 • ( 32 Comments) By a concerned […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

Something very strange is happening. A very concerning article and something that I truly hope is not true but I suspect is. After reading the article I decided to google the exact headline on this article and got no hits at all. I did the same on duckduckgo.
Of course the article was no where to be found on google. It was however easily found on duckduck go. I wonder why that is?

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  Anonymous
1 month ago

Google has long censored sites such as The Exposé. DuckDuckGo is better in this respect.

However, surprisingly, Google is very good when searching for articles on Whale.to, while DuckDuckGo mostly gives the impression that Whale.to does not exist. We cannot trust anything to be free of censorship.

Also Internet Providers themselves introduce a layer of censorship of their own. So that a Facebook friend cannot find things on either Google or DuckDuckGo which show up reliably on my computer.

A nurse on Twitter told me she was happy that she could not see The Exposé because it was censored and she trusted the censors.

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
1 month ago

I quoted a few words from your article on Twitter, and my tweet went viral, with 147,000 views:
https://twitter.com/GarethHawker/status/1452227566794858503

One man refused to read the article:
https://twitter.com/paulyherts/status/1452720412262010883

But he did make a comment which perhaps has some validity. The PHE itself has more or less said that its data is virtually useless as it stands, so should not be used to derive values for the efficacy of the vaccines.

I wonder what you think of this criticism?

Here is the section which I imagine the critic had in mind:

“Interpretation of data

These data should be considered in the context of vaccination status of the population groups shown in the rest of this report. The vaccination status of cases, inpatients and deaths is not the most appropriate method to assess vaccine effectiveness and there is a high risk of misinterpretation. Vaccine effectiveness has been formally estimated from a number of different sources and is described earlier in this report.”

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
1 month ago

WOW 147,000 views – well done! I did read that para from PHE I love it! They are saying do not draw the obvious conclusion from this data. You are forbidden from using our data to draw any conclusion which diasgrees with our stated position that vaccines are safe and vaccines are effective. Don’t you dare conclude anything from this data. You are hereby prohibited from interpreting this data. Any interpretation you make which runs contrary you our states position will be a misinterpretation.

Let me translate that para for you. We know that this data shows that vaccines destroy the immune system in a totally predictable totally consistent and indisputably linear manner at an alarmingly fast rate. We absolutely know that. So we had better write something that prevents people making that interpretation.

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Thanks. That was my feeling too. I also query the value of the studies that the PHE referred to as being an authoritative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, although I have not looked through all of them.

The key thing to check seems to the the definition of a case – whether that depends on genetic sequencing or on PCR and LFTs.

In addition, as you have pointed out, the PHE tables are internally consistent, in that the trends you have observed are relatively smooth, which suggests that, whatever is being measured, is being measured consistently.

John Cragar
John Cragar
1 month ago

What if it’s true? We will know rather quickly, won’t we.

John Cragar
John Cragar
1 month ago

Won’t the stock market go down?

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  John Cragar
1 month ago

It would be good to know. Do sick people sell their shares?

trackback
1 month ago

[…] October 23, 2021INVESTIGATION – Official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated will develop Acquired Imm… […]

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
1 month ago

Genetic sequencing.

A question came up from a good Facebook friend, a staunch opponent of vaccination.

Do you know whether the PHE has stated explicitly that the samples are sequenced?

“Oh gosh, oh golly, oh my! So PHE are, what, sampling the case positive individuals and doing a quick genetic sequencing, just to make sure? Like Jimmy in Middlesborough and Maisie, down the Rhondda as well as Lucy from Aberdeen and thousands of others, dotted all over everywhere. These extra, confirmatory tests are carried out where and how and……..my goodness, this whole world is getting madder by the minute!
No wonder our Sacred Manager of the Magic Money Forests is having to harvest a few extra billion of the readies to grease some more palms (mostly those in the Seychelles, of course……)”

I am attaching PHE’s account of its sources. Genetic sequencing is not mentioned explicitly. Perhaps I am missing something?

PHE data sources.png
Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
1 month ago

I mentioned your earlier reply to Garth (above):

QUOTE:

Good point. Your gut feeling is correct. It has been known for 2 months now (even articulated by Fauci) that the vaccines do not decrease the viral load, Since all vaccines can do (positively) is lower or raise viral load, it is hard to understand why the death rates are better among the vaccinated. The vaxxed death rates in the latest report for week 42 are 3x-6x lower in the doubly vaxxed than in the unvaxxed. Here is the reason in my opinion. I wrote to PHE, the NHS, Sir Patrick Vallance, Sajid Javid etc. just after the June21 PHE technical briefing came out which had the genetically sequenced delta deaths as follows.
June15-21: 4 unvaxxed deaths to 24 vaxxed deaths >50s
the total unvaxxed deaths (over and under 50s) in the preceding weeks were 12 then 11 then 10 (these early figures were not split into under and over 50s). Whereas the total vaxxed deaths were 10, then 14, then 24. (Technical briefings 15-17). These delta death rates did not support vaccination. In fact the vaxxed death rate caught up with the unvaxxed death rate in the over 50s (who had been vaxxed for the longest amount of time) on June21.

Their response was to not answer my email (they had answered a previous email), and to stop producing the figures “there was an interruption to the data provided to PHE by NHS digital”. They restarted the figures 2 weeks later and ran them biweekly instead of weekly, and hey presto the over 50 death rates all of a sudden did support vaccination. That we now know is impossible because the vaccines can now clearly be seen to be getting worse over time not better. The trouble with their new figures was that they did not rig the under 50s which I had not complained about. And I was able to deduce the correct over 50s death rate from their under 50s death rate and that corrected version (calculated in two different ways) continued the trend of the previous 3 weeks, showing that death rates in the vaxxed from detal per capita were now worse than in the unvaxxed.

I don’t know how they do it – there are many ways – but they are rigging the death rates in my view. It is totally illogical as you have realised for a vaccine which has only one mode of operation (reducing or increasing viral load) to lose the battle for infections and yet win the battle for deaths. I am guessing that it is a simpler matter to move the deaths from one column to another than it is to move the case numbers because there are a hell of a lot more cases than there are deaths. But that is merely a guess

:END OF QUOTE

Last edited 1 month ago by Gareth Hawker
Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
1 month ago

They have a GEneotyping PCR test now – YOu can find this in the Technical Briefings but not in the Vaccine Surveillance Reports –

Technical Briefings are published periodically, from 15 onwardstheyinclude variant diagnoses made both by whole-genome sequencing and by a genotyping PCR test, includingthe categorisation of confirmed and probable variant resultsand a rules-based decision algorithm (RBDA) to identify variant and mutation (VAM) profiles from genotype assay mutation profiles.Genotyping is used to identify variants Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma; targets were updated in mid-May 2021 to prioritise accurate identification of Delta over Alpha

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
1 month ago

Many thanks for the reply!

Ari Kivimäki
Ari Kivimäki
1 month ago

Did you stop to think the reason why unvaccinated are displaying less cases than vaccinated is because they’re being more careful with masks and staying indoors? Whereas vaccinated are running around and socializing. It’s not a comparable group. If the vaccinated were as careful as the unvaccinated there would be less cases. It’s not necessarily that their immune system is shot. If that was the case you would not only see thousands of cases but thousands, if not millions of hospital patients.
https://www.newsweek.com/leaked-uk-government-doc-claims-vaccine-passports-could-actually-cause-covid-spread-1642685?

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Ari Kivimäki
1 month ago

Masks have been in many studies to be ineffective in preventing transmission. Trying to stop a virus with a mask is like trying to stop a mosquito with a football net. If the virus particle is in a large droplet of water, then the mask may stop it. But the mechanism the mask has for stopping it is to catch the virus particle and hold it right next to your mouth as the water evaporates – DOH! Staying inddors damages the immune system as it prevents microinfections which are the basis of all natural immunity.
Losing 50% of you immune capacity against viruses and certain cancers does not immediately send you to hospital. AIDS takes several years to kill in the absence of anti retrovirals.

Alex
Alex
Reply to  Ari Kivimäki
1 month ago

Not at all, in fact, I’d submit to you that the unvaxxed have a grasp of reality and have been living their lives like normal since the beginning, as I have. In this case, we would be more likely to get sick if the popular narrative were true.

Sharon Jukes
Sharon Jukes
1 month ago

If people would read “Is Covid-19 a Bio weapon by Dr. Richard Fleming, PHD, MD, JD, or the cliff note version of this book Summary of Is Covid-19 a Bioweapon?” you will see that Richard Baric and his colleagues made a Chimera for Coronavirus and 3 patents were awarded in 2003. Richard Baric was awarded 173 grants from Fauci for his research. What was added to the coronavirus is Furin (PRRA) and HIV-GP 120. HIV-GP 120 causes the inflammation and blood clots, and people are dying of Aids. There are 590 Amino Acids inserted matching HIV-1. This is a smoking gun. They all need to be arrested for Crimes Against Humanity.

Alfred Griffioen
Alfred Griffioen
1 month ago

Thank you for this great article! I have reworked that rough data a bit different and made an article for the Dutch audience, but I also translated it in English, see: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/vaccination-like-sunscreen-after-while-effect-gone-alfred-griffioen/. It brings the results that you discovered in line with other scientific findings.

Protection factor over time.png
trackback
1 month ago

[…] INVESTIGACIÓN: los informes oficiales del gobierno sugieren que los totalmente vacunados desarrollarán el síndrome de inmunodificencia adquirida a finales de año. https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/23/government-reports-suggest-fully-vaccinated-develop-ade-by-the-end-o&#8230; […]

xtuartb
xtuartb
1 month ago

If the motivation behind this is greed – a never-ending vaccination-regime rolling in trillions year after year – then killing the vaxxed does not make sense.

Assuming these figures (a) are real, and (b) do imply what the author states, then the only plausible motive is population-reduction, to the extent of killing off the entire vaccinated population of the world.

Many thanks for this piece, which led me here for the first time. It is particularly astute in using both the official figures AND the pharma-corporations’ own methodology to draw the implications. They are hoist by their own petard.

Ruth
Ruth
1 month ago
Ruth
Ruth
1 month ago

Thanks for the insight

Jarno P
Jarno P
1 month ago

IT’S NOTHING LESS THAN PLANNED GENOCIDE !!

Jarno P
Jarno P
1 month ago

END OF THE YEAR, HALF OF VAXXED ARE DEAD, AND ONLY WE PURE-BLOODS KEEP KICKING !!

Jarno P
Jarno P
1 month ago

VAXXED PEOPLE WILL DIE !!

NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING !!

Last edited 1 month ago by Jarno P
trackback
7 days ago

[…] article from The Exposé claims that Covid-19 vaccine data from England shows that the fully vaccinated are developing […]

trackback
7 days ago

[…] article from The Exposé claims that Covid-19 vaccine data from England shows that the fully vaccinated are developing […]

trackback
7 days ago

[…] world where the vaccines have a -100% effectiveness, using the Exposé’s calculation, is one where the case rate among unvaccinated people is zero, and the case rate among vaccinated […]