Breaking News

Official data suggests the Triple Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome at an alarming rate

An in-depth investigation of 5 months worth of official UK Government data published by the UK Health Security Agency seems to confirm predictions previously made by The Expose that the Covid-19 “booster” dose would provide a very short lived temporary boost to the immune systems of the vaccinated population before decimating their immune systems much more rapidly than had already been seen in people who had received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.

In short, official UK Government data strongly suggests that the Covid-19 vaccinated population are developing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publish a weekly Vaccine Surveillance Report, with each report containing four weeks worth of data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status. For our investigation we analysed 5 of these published Vaccine Surveillance Reports containing data from August 16th 2021 to January 2nd 2022, in order to get a clear picture on the effect the Covid-19 vaccines are having on the immune systems of the vaccinated population, and this is what we found…

The UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Reports used for our investigation can all be found here –

Real-World Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

Pfizer claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of a simple calculation (full details of which can be viewed here) performed on the number of infections confirmed amongst the vaccinated group and the not-vaccinated group during the earliest stages of the still ongoing clinical trials.

Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, and the data unfortunately paints an extremely concerning picture.

The week 37 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 33 and week 36 of 2021 (August 16th to September 12th). Because the report tells us the Covid-19 case rates per 100,000 people among the unvaccinated and two dose vaccinated population we are able to calculate the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period, and it proved to be as follows –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-47% in the 60-69 age group, and as high as +66% in the under 18 age group between August 16th and September 12th 2021. The only other age groups that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point were 18-29, 30-39, and 80+. But as you can clearly see none of the age groups were showing a vaccine effectiveness anywhere near 95%.

However, just look at how the tables turn just one month later.

The week 41 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 37 and week 40 of 2021 (September 13th to October 10th), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-109% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +89% in the under 18 age group between September 13th and October 10th 2021. The only other age group that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point was 18-29.

What’s concerning here though is how far the real-world effectiveness of the vaccine has fallen in all age groups, but especially the 40-49 age group which fell from a real world of effectiveness of minus-36% to minus-109%.

The fact that the real-world effectiveness of the vaccines had surpassed the minus-100% barrier in suggested that not only were the vaccines failing, but they were also completely decimating the immune system of the recipients.

This makes the next Vaccine Surveillance report frightening reading.

The week 45 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021 (October 11th to November 7th), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows – –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-126% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +78% in the under 18 age group between October 11th to November 7th 2021. The only other age group that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point was again 18-29.

What’s concerning here is that two more age-groups have surpassed the minus-100% barrier, with the 50-59 age group falling to minus-116% and the 60-69 age group falling to minus-120%. But what is perhaps more concerning is that the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections has continued to decline in the 40-49 age group after already surpassing the minus-100% barrier in the previous month.

What we can also see from the above is that the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injection in persons over the age of 80 has climbed from minus-22% to minus-9 percent. This coincides with the booster jab roll-out to this age group, suggesting the vaccines do in fact boost the immune system But it is worth noting that there is still a negative effectiveness in this age group, and it still lower than the minus-3% effectiveness seen between week 33 and week 36 of 2021.

The week 49 Vaccine Surveillance report however, provides a much clearer picture on the effect of the boosters on the vaccinated population in the short term.

The week 49 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 45 and week 48 of 2021 (November 8th to December 5th), and the and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-120% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +80% in the under 18 age group between November 8th to December 5th 2021. The real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections actually only decreased in the 18-29-year-olds and 30-39-year-olds during these four weeks.

People over the age of 70 were rewarded with a major boost to their immune systems over these four weeks, with vaccine effectiveness proving to be +27% in 70-79-year-olds between 8th Nov and 5th Dec 21, compared to minus-84% between 11th Oct and 7th Nov 21.

Whilst vaccine effectiveness in people over the age of 80 increased to +47% between 8th Nov and 5th Dec 21, compared to minus-9% between 11th Oct and 7th Nov 21.

Everyone between the age of 40 and 69 was also rewarded with a boost to their immune system during this period, however not enough to show a positive vaccine effectiveness. This boost in vaccine effectiveness coincides with when the booster shots were administered to each age group as can be seen in the below graph taken from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 1 – 2022.

Based on vaccine effectiveness turning positive in everyone over the age of 70 following the booster shot after previously showing a negative effectiveness, we should expect to see a much improved vaccine effectiveness in 40-69-year-olds in the next published Vaccine Surveillance Report.

But unfortunately this isn’t the case.

The week 1 – 2022- Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 49 and week 52 of 2021 (December 6th to January 2nd), and the and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period proved to be as follows –

Real-world vaccine effectiveness dropped to the lowest levels yet across all age groups except for the over 70’s between December 6th and January 2nd, but the over 70’s still dropped into negative effectiveness.

The expected further boost to 40 to 69-year-olds did not materialise and instead a huge tumble in vaccine effectiveness was recorded, dropping to -151% in 40-49-yer-olds.

Vaccine effectiveness also tumbled in the 30-39-year-old age group to minus-123%, despite the booster jab being administered to millions in week 49.

The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in vaccine effectiveness by the month among each age group over a period of 5 months from 16th Aug 21 to 2nd Jan 22.

The first booster shots were administered in week 37 of 2021, and this graph illustrates clearly how they provided a boost in vaccine effectiveness in the following two months. But unfortunately it also shows how short lived this boost was with the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between week 49 and 52.

But what does a positive / negative vaccine effectiveness actually mean?

Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack and provoking the immune system into responding as if you have had the virus. They are supposed to train the immune system to the point where you develop natural immunity to the virus. Therefore, vaccine effectiveness is really a measure of the immune system performance induced by the vaccine.

A vaccine effectiveness of +50% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is 50% better at tackling Covid-19.

A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 0% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, meaning the vaccines are ineffective. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is equal to that of the unvaccinated at tackling Covid-19.

Whilst a vaccine effectiveness of -50% would mean that the unvaccinated were 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the fully vaccinated, meaning the vaccines actually decimate the immune system.

Therefore with the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines proving to be negative in everyone over the age of 18 in England, this means double/triple vaccinated adults immune systems are being decimated.

Immune System Performance

The formula used to calculate the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines was based on the exact calculation used by Pfizer to demonstrate that their vaccine had an alleged effectiveness of 95%.

  • U = No. of Cases among the unvaccinated  
  • V = No. of Cases among the fully vaccinated
  • U – V / U = Vaccine Effectiveness

However in order to calculate the immune system performance we need to perform a slightly different calculation that divides the answer to U – V by the largest of the number of cases among either the unvaccinated or fully vaccinated.

Therefore, the calculation for a positive immune system performance is –

U – V / U

Whilst the calculation for a negative immune system performance is –

U – V / V

The following table shows the monthly boost/decline in the immune systems of the vaccinated population compared to the natural immune systems of the unvaccinated population-

This shows that as of the 2nd January 2021 (Month 5), triple/double vaccinated 40-49-year-olds currently have the worst immune system performance at -60%. But they are closely followed by 30-39-year-olds at -58%, 18-29-year-olds and 50-59-year-olds at -55%, and 60-69-year-olds at -47%.

The following graph illustrates the overall immune system performance among all age groups in England over the past 5 months –

What we can see from the above is that the immune system performance for adults aged between 18 and 59 has deteriorated to the worst levels yet since they were given the Covid-19 vaccine. Whilst the immune system performance of everyone over the age of 60 has deteriorated dramatically following receipt of the booster shot, but not yet to the level seen between week 37 and week 40.

The over 70’s have however seen the most dramatic fall in immune system performance between month 4 and month 5 alongside 18-29-year-olds.

The 55% boost to the immune systems of the over 80’s given by the boosters between month 3 and month 4 has all but deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is performing 1% better than it was in month 3 but still 54% worse than their unvaccinated counterparts.

The 73% boost to the immune systems of the 70-79-year-olds given by the boosters between month 3 and month 4 has also all but deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is performing 10% better than it was in month 3 but still 63% worse than their unvaccinated counterparts.

The minor boost however, given to the immune Systems of everyone between the age of 30 and 59 by the boosters between month 3 and 4 has been completely decimated by the following month, whilst 18-29-year-olds have seen a 60% decline in their immune system performance between months 4 and 5.

The following graph illustrates the boost/degradation in immune system performance among all age groups in England over the past 5 months –

Covid-19 Vaccine Induced Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

The real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections wains significantly in a short amount of time, but unfortunately for the vaccinated population, rather than the immune system returning to the same state it was prior to vaccination, the immune system performance begins to rapidly decline making it inferior to that of the unvaccinated.

Now the official UK Government data proves that a booster dose of the vaccine can give a short term boost to the immune system of the vaccinated, but unfortunately this same data shows that the immune system performance then begins to decline even faster than it was prior to the booster dose being given.

This data therefore suggests that the vaccinated population will now require an endless cycle of booster shots to boost their immune systems to a point where it does not fail but is inferior to that of the unvaccinated population.

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is a condition that leads to the loss of immune cells and leaves individuals susceptible to other infections and the development of certain types of cancers. In other words, it completely decimates the immune system.

Therefore, could we be seeing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome?

Only time will tell, but judging by the current figures it looks like we will only need to wait a matter of weeks to find out.


The Exposé is now censored by
Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support

Send Monero

The Expose Monero Wallet Address –
89bg5cqeUpiBq3ci8ZaAco6wh87FP4xJLMXtajv5VkSueijLgmbVxr4fud5qMEih5D2655XGVcHHnVwx5X4idmCS7w3wSxa


Embalmers Find Veins & Arteries Filled with “Never Before Seen” Rubbery Clots
Board-certified funeral director and embalmer, Richard Hirschman has made a startling discovery …
Fully Vaccinated Olympic Gold Medalist “Dies of Covid”, Reports Mainstream Media
Sky News was revealed to be meddling with the truth about Olympic …
Prof. Werner Bergholz: Dangerous Chemicals and Nanotubes Found In Covid Test Swabs
Parents, please read so you are armed with additional information to enable …
German Health Minister says Tyrannical Covid-19 Restrictions for Unvaccinated were based on “Software Error”
After terrorising the unvaccinated for months, German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is …
VAIDS – Every 1% fall in Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness is the result of a 0.5-1% fall in your Immune System capability
Official data from around the world does not only show that the …
Covid-19 Vaccines are projected to cause 62.3 Million Cardiovascular Deaths in 2022 Worldwide
An investigation of currents trends has revealed that the Covid-19 vaccines are …
Canadian Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Now Negatively Impacting Pig and Feed Shipments
Canada and the United States' new vaccine mandates are creating a shortage …
50,000 Strong Trucker Convoy Travels to Ottawa, Canada, Demanding End to Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates
A convoy of truckers is travelling across Canada towards Ottawa in protest …
Hidden Alliance of former WEF Young Global Leaders working in Lockstep to enforce the Great Reset include Macron, Trudeau, Ardern, & Boris Johnson
How is it that more than 190 governments from all over the …

Share this page to Telegram
4.5 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
46 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Remo Badii
Remo Badii
13 days ago

In order to avoid misunderstandings, you should give the formulae as follows:
(U-V)/U, (U-V)/V, that is, with the paretheses.
Thank you for the thorough and informative reports.

MarshaCollison
MarshaCollison
Reply to  Remo Badii
13 days ago

I am creating an honest wage from home 1900 Dollars/week , that is wonderful, below a year gone i used to be unemployed during an atrocious economy. (cfg28) I convey God on a daily basis. I used to be endowed with these directions and currently it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with everybody.

Here is where I started…….. http://Www.Self25.com

Last edited 13 days ago by MarshaCollison
Diane Arcuri
Diane Arcuri
Reply to  Remo Badii
13 days ago

I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 13 days ago by Diane Arcuri
Wyle e coyote, super genius
Wyle e coyote, super genius
Reply to  Remo Badii
11 days ago

Um… simple mathematics and Order of Operations… multiplication and division operations are always performed first, then addition and subtraction after, in the order which they appear. No confusion if you follow the rules of 4th grade math

Wyle e coyote, super genius
Wyle e coyote, super genius
Reply to  Remo Badii
11 days ago

The more pressing point, I think, needing to be made which is NOT shown in this series of graphs…. how many of the jabbed actually ended up dying, and no longer had ANY functioning immune system? We have all known well before this study (although the study is GREAT info and backup for argument sake), that the “vaccines” decimate the immune system via viral overload. This info only is referencing those who are still alive after getting the ole 1-2-3… now, eventually, we do know that a very large percentage of jabbed persons will die as a result of these gene therapies, which are not vaccines. It is predicted between 1-3 years after, for those that survive early on… I hope this study continues into the future to report the further declines of immune systems, but to also reflect death rates

Phil
Phil
13 days ago

I want to support the expose financially but also want to feel secure about where that money goes and what your financial targets are.

I think this is a tremendous publication you should be very proud of.

We need to see an editorial masthead with names.

Kdubya
Kdubya
Reply to  Phil
13 days ago

It is a tremendous publication because readers are able to track and trace the sources referenced in many of Expose’s articles. That kind of transparency is extremely hard to come by elsewhere. So,if the price of such transparency and in-depth journalism is authorship anonymity, in a time of censorship and intimidation, then I, for one, can live with it.

Last edited 13 days ago by Kdubya
JudiCarroll
JudiCarroll
Reply to  Kdubya
13 days ago

I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have TNE to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE…..,
>>>>>>> http://Www.SmartPay1.com

Last edited 13 days ago by JudiCarroll
juliya
juliya
13 days ago

I have just received my 3rd paycheck which said that $16285 that i have made just in one month by working online over my laptop. This job is amazing and its regular earnings nwo are much better than my regular office job. Join this job now and start making money online easily by just use this link…. http://www.Buzzjoin.com

Last edited 13 days ago by juliya
Kathy Dopp
Kathy Dopp
13 days ago

The authors of this article are showing an incorrect formula for vaccine effectiveness, so I hope their calculations are not incorrect. The real formula for Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) is either:
(U-V)/U or, equivalently, 1 – U/V
If the RRR is negative, then the vaccine has negative effectiveness or is more likely to make a vaccinated person get the disease (as is true for the COVID vaccines after one to a few months post-vaccination). This is called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, or ADE, which is the reason no one has been able to develop a vaccine for any coronavirus before.

The other formula given about is just the opposite of the first. (U-V)/V or U/V – 1.

A better value for evaluating vaccine effectiveness is Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) because it takes into account the prevalence of infections in the population. The formula for that is (U-V)/P where P= the # of people in the total population, in other words, the actual percentage in reduction of cases (or, if evaluating vaccines by hospitalizations or deaths, then use hospitalizations or deaths rather than cases, divided again by the total population) in the population. The ARRs of the Covid jabs can be compared to the real risks of vaccine-induced adverse events to calculate the actual benefit (if +) or risk (if -).

Last edited 13 days ago by Kathy Dopp
Kathy Dopp
Kathy Dopp
Reply to  Kathy Dopp
12 days ago

I see they still did not fix their formulas for RRR but I made a mistake in giving the formula above for absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is actually:

empirical ARR = U/(the total number of persons in the population Unvaccinated) minus V/(the total number of people in the population Vaccinated)

trial data ARR = U/(the total number of persons in the unvaccinated control group) minus V/(the total number of people in the vaccinated treatment group)

Last edited 12 days ago by Kathy Dopp
Keith R. Starkey
Keith R. Starkey
Reply to  Kathy Dopp
11 days ago

Doesn’t really matter, does, it, if there are a few errors—if even half of what they said were in error, it’s still very, very bad news.

AttilaTheHun
AttilaTheHun
Reply to  Kathy Dopp
10 days ago

I can see where you’d want to look at an effect as a proportion of the unvaccinated part of the total population. However, Expose was following the Pfizer methodology to be consistent with the government/Pfizer claims.

We’re ultimately looking at relative changes, so the denominator would be the same for all of the calculations and the percentage change would be the same as Expose calculated, wouldn’t it?

Beyond
Beyond
Reply to  Kathy Dopp
11 days ago

would there be any definitive way to determine how so many died in Italy at one time and how the initial focus was so heavily weighted in Italy. We know we were fooled with the diamond princess cruises but were we fooled with Italy? Its my understanding that they had been given a batch of experimental flu vaccines just prior to this disgusting act of Gen…o….side…….

trackback
13 days ago

[…] Official data suggests the Triple Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome at an alarming rate .https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/15/triple-vaccinated-developing-ade/ […]

James Chan
James Chan
12 days ago

It would help strengthen your argument that vaccination leads to a Vaccine-derived AIDS if you can compare rates per 100,000 for infection, hospitalisation and death between the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts. By showing absolute numbers only, one can argue that if 90% of the population has been vaccinated, of course higher numbers for each outcome will be expected amongst the vaccinated group. However, rates/100,000 data would quickly show the difference.

My concern for this not being shown in all your articles make me question if the rates are inconvenient to your basic premise. 

jmj
jmj
Reply to  James Chan
12 days ago

We’re talking contamination status here. And there is not a single argument for that kind of data to drop to NEGATIVE EV territory within a couple of monthes.

Marybeth
Marybeth
Reply to  jmj
12 days ago

Yes, Dr. Judy Mikovits stated that vaccine contamination was discovered by her in 2009 and in 2011 she presented her findings to a group 9f peers, who decided the expense of rectifying the situation was such a huge expense it would be better to just not mention it.

Marybeth
Marybeth
Reply to  James Chan
12 days ago

Listen to Dr. Judy Mikovits re hiv & vax, it’s been kept on the downlow.
She linked chronic fatigue to this although I cannot remember the details.
She knows a lot that’s why Fauci went after her.

Beyond
Beyond
Reply to  Marybeth
11 days ago

all explained in Plandemic 1 and 2 as well as in her books. she knows what these people are all about

Poppy
Poppy
12 days ago

“This shows that as of the 2nd January 2021 (Month 5) . . .”

That should be 2022.

Snoek
Snoek
12 days ago

Not at all accurate. 66% in under 18 is bullshit cause kids have natural immunity and maybe 1 in a billion chance to die of covid or even have any problems with it at all. If you vaccinate children you should get the death penalty cause all you do is put them at risk of heart diseases or other complications.

sagamif918
sagamif918
12 days ago

Start making more money weekly… This is a valuable part time work for everyone… The best part ,work from comfort of your house and get paid from $10k-$20k each week … Start today and have your first cash at the end of this week…
w.w.w.n.o.w.3.7.c.o.m

Marybeth
Marybeth
12 days ago

I fully intend to donate…this is an exemplary article and will be used when a case is made against Fauci, Gates & the rest.
I feel really bad that I can’t right now…this is IMPORTANT WORK and I, for one, feel a sense of obligation to you for putting information together.
Now is the time to begin living differently, closer together no matter the distance in miles.
We can do this by supporting others.

Jeremy
Jeremy
12 days ago

Boosters will only accelerate the AIS.

Abigail C Smas
Abigail C Smas
12 days ago

I’m confused. “Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack.” Yes, but the mRNA is not a traditional vaccine. It doesn’t simulate an attack. The mRNA uses spike proteins as markers on the virus enabling your immune system to effectively attack it. Am I wrong?
Please clarify for a non-scientist. Thanks

AMF
AMF
Reply to  Abigail C Smas
12 days ago

mRNA causes your body to produce the spike protein which then triggers your immune system. Basically, you’re making the virus signature protein and adapting to it at the same time, which is why areas with high vaccination rates also have high infection rates. Vaccinated people are viral load containers. … and they keep boosting … If you keep telling your body to keep producing harmful spike proteins, don’t get surprised when your immune system eventually collapses.

Last edited 12 days ago by AMF
Beyond
Beyond
Reply to  Abigail C Smas
11 days ago

we have been lead to believe a bunch of hog wash. This is all on moderna website they explain their new “software of life” making it look like a positive thing that our bodies will start eating themselves. These people are injecting nano particles of graphene and other crap and after enough of this they will be able to have us monitored via 5G etc. God help any woman or girl who tries to leave a captor or any person who tries to defect a country.

trackback
11 days ago

[…] dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/15/triple-vaccinated-developing-ade/ […]

WilliamtheResolute
WilliamtheResolute
11 days ago

The bottom line in far fewer words: The Vaccine is the pandemic…it’s developed by eugenicists who subscribe to a Globalist depopulation narrative…they want you useless eaters dead.

Chris
Chris
11 days ago

Just saw another claim that says it’s Covid they are suspecting is messing with the T-cells. Were the people in this study vaxxed only and never had Covid or did some have both Covid and the vax?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1482895592183541762

Ozark
Ozark
11 days ago

I chose to participate in the experiment . I am in the control group. it would seem they need individuals like me inorder to get accurate results.

Beyond
Beyond
11 days ago

It is so difficult to believe much these days. how do we assure accuracy in your materials when we have been duped by so many its mind blowing

Splish_Splash
Splish_Splash
11 days ago

Aericans are sleep walking through the days and months, their minds will NOT ALLOW THEM TO THINK SOMETHING PURPOSELY SINISTER IS GOING ON. I THINK THE ONLY THING THAT WILL WAKE PEOPLE UP IS IF IN EVERY SINGLE CITY IN THE COUNTRY THAT 1000S OF PEOPLE DROP DEAD SUDDENELY OR UNEXPECTEDLY. AND FRANKLY I DON’T THINK THEY WILL COME UP WITH THE CORRECT ANSWER AS TO WHAT I GOING ON.

TheTruthBurns
TheTruthBurns
11 days ago

Fauci’s team created AIDS – the Sars/Covid2 is a combination of the common cold Sars & HIV that’s why when the Plandemic 1st hit, Vietnam, Thailand & South Korea used Anti-Virals & wiped out this crap but were soon Forced into the Worldwide PharMafia with a gun to their heads. Pfizer only made 24 Billion last year – 13 Billion from the jab alone – so get ready for the new pills that will cost $750 each – ALL paid for by US Taxpayers. Scamdemic/Plandemic.

Frank Albini
Frank Albini
Reply to  TheTruthBurns
9 days ago

Fauci did not create AIDS. His team did not create AIDS. I was one of those team members in the 1980s and 90s and I worked directly with him at NIH. Odd fellow – yes. Dishonest – yes. Manipulative – yes. Inventor of AIDS – NO.

Mark Stevens
Mark Stevens
Reply to  TheTruthBurns
9 days ago

The HIV connection is nonsense. The motifs in HIV that bind to specific immune cells (hence immunodeficiency) are naturally found in many viruses all over the world but usually never develop to the level of HIV. Nowhere close actually, SARS-2 included, which does utilize the backbone of SARS-1, but neither are “of the common cold” and both are distinct viruses from influenza. As for who made it or how it evolved is still up for debate. The 9 closest viruses to SARS-2 were all found in WIV prior to the outbreak (mostly from bats) and any animal host that could have been infected with any of those and thus produced the requisite FCS that somehow matches the binding sites in humans have yet to be identified. I’m inclined to believe the lab incident since the creation of chimaeric coronaviruses have been ongoing for decades, see:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18787
Plus, thanks to the FOIA, it is known that bat coronaviruses were being studied at WIV and places in the U.S. (UNC, for one) to study their virulence utilizing humanized mice cells, possibly human lung cells, as summarized here:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-new-fauci-agency-covid-records-reveal-information-about-nih-research-into-the-coronavirus/
and if you read through the document dump on p45 you’ll find they were utilizing human subjects:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21099965-gain-of-function-communications-between-ecohealth-alliance-and-niaid

Scott Schlegel
Scott Schlegel
10 days ago

Great analysis and site.

When reading the UK reports, I come to the conclusion that they’re using 100K general population and not unit populations. Are you certain they are unit populations of per 100K vaxxed and 100K non-vaxxed? It would make a big difference but still might paint the same picture of gradual decline.

I did some similar analysis on my site scottschlegel (dot) net analyzing case rates across all the US counties. There is no surprise, but there are way more cases in higher vax rate counties.

Gammer
Gammer
10 days ago

Let’s pray that this is a temporary condition for our vaccinated friends and relatives. That when they clear the vaccine spike proteins in 12-18 months, that they will return to at least normal. including normal rates of heart disease, and women are able to still reproduce. What a horrible mistake, I’m praying it is temporary at worst.

BileJones
BileJones
10 days ago

Official data suggests the Triple Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome at an alarming rate

One has to ask; Alarming to whom?

Paul Foster
Paul Foster
10 days ago

For those that look for excuses (eg well since there are more people double and triple vaccinated have more freedoms so this group are bound to show more cases) This data shows this is not the case. ALL officials that continue to push this insanity need to be charged with gross incompetence and crimes against humanity. Our leaders already broke the law in implementing tyrannical restrictions that had no justification in the 1st place despite a public willing to go along with it at 1st.

BoombeeShark
BoombeeShark
10 days ago

While I agree with general discussions and concerns about the vaccination, this article is somewhat flawed…. while the vaccination has declining efficacy against transmission (as established via scientific studies), all the observed data from UK Health Security could most likely be attributed to behavioural change once people are vaccinated.

The “lab science” established efficacy under ideal conditions. Most of this data has been independently verified and accepted by the scientific community.

The problem is taking the “lab science” into the real world where vaccinated people start to act differently once vaccinated. Much of this behavioural change, I believe, is a direct result of poor government policy where vaccinations were pushed “to protect your family”… turns out this protection wanes quickly, i.e. gone after 12 weeks. This waning protection is NOT widely known, with lack of additional protection mitigation, e.g. masks, social distancing, not being actioned.

As evidence of this general misunderstanding of waning vaccine efficacy against transmission check out Whoopi Goldberg’s shock at getting COVID after being double vaxxed plus booster. In earlier episodes of “The View” (I think that is her show) panel members were verbally “shut down” when this FACT of vaccinations was stated.

(My) Conclusion: Vaccinated are being infected at a higher rate than unvaccinated due to behavioural change.

While various immuno-effects could be in play, it isn’t reasonable to conclude that much from the data provided.

……. just saying.