|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Serious questions need to be answered as to why Boris Johnson’s Government have decided to restrict the freedoms of the unvaccinated population through the introduction of Vaccine Passports, when the latest official data shows that the vaccinated population have accounted for 3 in every 5 Covid-19 cases, 3 in every 5 Covid-19 hospitalisations, and 4 in every 5 Covid-19 deaths, in England since August 16th 2021.
During a national Covid-19 briefing that took place on Tuesday December 8th, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom announced that ‘Plan B’ would be implemented in England from Wednesday December 15th, which would entail ‘working from home’ (if you can) orders, and the introduction of Vaccine Passports.
The reason given for the commencement of ‘Plan B’ is that it has to be done to protect the public from the alleged new Omicron variant of the Covid-19 virus. A variant which as of December 11th, has failed to cause a single fatality in the UK, with just several hundred cases allegedly being confirmed.
A new law will come into effect from Wednesday December 15th, which will state that Vaccine Passports will become mandatory for entry to nightclubs and other large venues, including Premier League football matches and concerts. We’re told they will be required for indoor settings of 500 people or more, outdoor settings of 4,000 people or more, and any setting with 10,000 attendees or more.
There will be many in England who believe Vaccine Passports are the answer to their prayers. Two years of misinformation, and disinformation mixed with propaganda published by the mainstream media can do that to people. But unfortunately the official data published by the UK Government proves that they are far from it, and suggests Vaccine Passports have absolutely nothing to do with protecting public health, and instead everything to do with controlling the nation.
The UK Health Security Agency (PHE) is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care and recently replaced Public Health England. The Chief Executive of the agency is Dr Jenny Harries OBE, who you may recognise from the television as she has served as Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England throughout the pandemic.
The UKHSA publish a weekly ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ report which contains data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status over a period of four weeks, and unfortunately for the vaccinated population, the official data shows that they have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths for at least the past four months.
We have used the following official reports for our analysis –
- COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 37 (Covers Week 33-36)
- COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 41 (Covers Week 37-40)
- COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 45 (Covers Week 41-44)
- COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 49 (Covers Week 45-48)
Covid-19 Cases
Table 8 of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status in England. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by the UKHSA, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.
The chart shows that between August and early September, the fully vaccinated population accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases. However, between the middle of September and early October this switched to the not-vaccinated population accounting for the majority of cases. This is most likely due to children returning to school in September and being “encouraged” to test on a regular basis.
But between October 11th and December 5th the roles reversed again, and it is the fully vaccinated population that have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases in England.
This data alone puts an end to the myth that it is selfish to not be vaccinated, because it’s quite clear the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission. Which begs the question as to why Boris Johnson has decided to implement Vaccine Passports in England?
The above chart shows the cumulative number of cases by vaccination status between 16 Aug 21 and 05 Dec 21, and illustrates quite clearly that the fully vaccinated have accounted for the majority of cases since August.
What we can see from the above is that the unvaccinated had accounted for the majority of cases up to October 10th, however since this date there has been a switch with the fully vaccinated taking the lead, hitting a cumulative total of 1.5 million confirmed cases by Dec 5th.
When including the 258,387 confirmed cases among the partly vaccinated during this period, the total cases among the vaccinated population rises to 1,757,444. Whilst the number of cases among the unvaccinated population during this period of 16 weeks has amounted to 1,403,100.
Covid-19 Hospitalisations
Table 9 of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status in England. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by the UKHSA, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.
You may have heard several times this week on national television from people such as Dr Hilary, Lorraine Kelly, and Martin Kemp that “90% of the people currently in hospital with Covid-19 have not been vaccinated”.
Well it looks like they have been lying to you because the official UK Government data the fully vaccinated population have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 hospitalisation every month since at least August.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of hospitalisations by vaccination status between 16 Aug 21 and 05Dec 21, and shows just how bad things have actually been for the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated.
Between Aug 16 and Dec 05, the unvaccinated population accounted for 11,767 Covid-19 hospitalisations. But the vaccinated population have accounted for nearly double the amount, recording 19,730 hospitalisations, with 18,406 of those being among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population. This means the vaccinated population have accounted for 63% of Covid-19 hospitalisations since August 2021.
Covid-19 Deaths
Table 10 (b) of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status in England. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by the UKHSA, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.
The above chart proves that the fully vaccinated population have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 deaths every single month since August 2021, with things really taking a turn for the worse in October.
The highest number of Covid-19 deaths in single four week period among the fully vaccinated population has been 3,284, whereas the highest number of Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population in a four week period has been just 850. That’s a 286% difference.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of deaths by vaccination status between 16 Aug 21 and 05 Dec 21, and illustrates quite clearly that this is very much a pandemic of the fully vaccinated.
Between 16 Aug 21 and 05 Dec 21 there were 3,070 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population in England, compared to 12,058 deaths among the vaccinated population during the same time frame. That is a 293% difference.
Covid-19 Fatality Rates by Vaccination Status
The official data shows the the vaccinated population have accounted for 56% of Covid-19 cases, 63% of hospitalisations, and 80% of deaths over the past 16 weeks in England.
It’s quite clear that the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission, but they are alleged to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death. However, if this were the case then should we not be seeing a graph that looks more like this?
So why aren’t we?
It could have something to do witht he fact that the data suggests the Covid-19 injections are actually increasing the risk of death due to Covid-19 rather than reducing it by the claimed 95%.
The following graph shows the case-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population, and the case-fatality rate among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population over the past 16 weeks.
The case-fatality rate is calculated by dividing the number of known deaths by the number of known cases among the population. As we can see from the above the case-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population is just 0.2%, which is what is in line with the average case-fatality rate in 2020 before a Covid-19 injection was introduced to the masses.
However, the case-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated population is much higher, equating to 0.8%. Therefore the fully vaccinated are 4 times / 300% more likely to die if exposed to the Covid-19 virus based on official UK Government figures.
The following graph shows the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population, and the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population over the past 16 weeks.
The hospitalisation-fatality rate is calculated by dividing the number of known deaths by the number of known hospitalisations among the population. As we can see from the above the hospitalsiation-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population is 26%.
But the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated population is frighteningly higher equating to a shocking 63%. This means the fully vaccinated population are 2.4 / 142% more likely to die once hospitalised with Covid-19.
So now that you know that the double / triple jabbed population have accounted for 3 in every 5 cases, 3 in every 5 hospitalisations, and 4 in every 5 Deaths over the past 4 months in England, and that the UK Government has been laughing at you since at least Christmas 2020 through their alleged Christmas parties, are you going to allow them to take away your freedom yet again in response to an alleged variant that has so far caused zero fatalities, or are you going to stand up, carry on living, and say “no” this time around?
Because this will not end until we all say it does.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
We are being heavily censored. Please share this article…
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
[…] Source link […]
●▬▬▬▬ ✹ 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐲 𝐀𝐭 𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞&𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐀𝐭 𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞 ✹ ▬▬▬▬●
[ JOIN US ] I get paid more than $120 to $95 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $24000k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>>
GOOD LUCK… http://Www.NETCASH1.Com
helllo
So recieved
And the not vaccinated, are NOT the people, like me, who have refused to get a vaccination, the not vaccinated are the people who have had the vaccines and are dying or getting severe side effects, before the 14 days is up – so that they don’t qualify to be vaccinated, after all, do they?
So does that mean that the vaccines now have a 100% kill rate?
They never mention the immuno compromised and severly ill who cannot have the kill shot, they just class them as “unvaccinated” as well
I am making $200 to $300per hour doing online work from home. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.if you interested…Go to this link, fill out a basic online form and hit submit at,Home Profit System And Follow The instructions as Home Profit System And Set Up your Account.. GOOD LUCK★★↓↓↓↓THIS WEBSITE↓↓↓↓>>>>>>HERE☛ http://Www.SmartPay1.com
helllo
Possible considering that we don’t know how many were placebos. In my opinion those who are still well got placebo(s). Which one will be the ‘real bullet’ to them? 3rd? 6th?
That’s right. EVERYONE, who takes that injection, WILL DIE, of resultant complications, probably within the next three years, but maybe a lot sooner. That said, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, 50% of deaths from the “covid-19” “vaccines” take place in 48 hours, 80%, within a week. Here’s a good place to start, I think: https://odysee.com/@BannedYouTubeVideos:4/Dr-Peter-McCullough-Interview-The-Vaccines-are-Killing-People:b
If that would be true, then 75% of 66 000 000 = 49 500 000. With 50% death 24 225 000 should have been dead in 48 hours, right? Where are the bodies?
80% within a week means almost 40 million dead. We surely would have noticed it…
Does McCullough know the number of placebo shots?
80% of the people who died due to the vaccination died within a week of taking the vaccination
not
80% of the people vaccinated died within week.
ITS ALL CORUPT EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM WORLD WIDE
I’ve made $84,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. The potential with this is endless.
Here’s what I do… http://Www.WorkJoin1.com
[…] December 11, 2021Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully V… […]
I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills .
Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…. http://www.Newapp1.com
A great article. To make matters worse, as another commenter mentioned, you only count as “vaccinated” after 14 days of the first jab.
So anyone dying within 14 days from an adverse reaction to the vaccine, but who tests positive for covid, is listed as an “unvaccinated” covid death.
This skews the numbers by adding more deaths to the “unvaccinated” pool.
What we also need to see is the number of people who died within 14 days of the jab.
However, the government alleges it doesn’t have that data.
So bear in mind this is the worst case position for the unvaccinated. They are actually even less likely to die than these figures show…making being unvaxxed even safer.
It’s not clear. The population of vaxxed is maybe 9 x greater than the population of unvaxxed now, in the UK? Approx 90% of YK population are vaxxed? So the graphs need to show that in order to give accurate comparisons.
Secondly, it’s not clear if the final graph is covud-related mortality or all-cause mortality. I took it to be all-cause mortality, but the text refers specifically to covid. So that’s confusing.
If you want accurate data analysis, El Gato Malo, Alex Berenson, Steve Kirsch etc all do very careful analyses. I think the Expose do great work in very many ways but stats doesn’t seem to be their strong point.
Thank you for sharing those names, where can I find them please?
Substack
You can find the vax % graphs here: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55274833 the age curve graph shows that half the entire population was jabbed at least once by May, and about 75% by September. The bar graph shows 175 vax shots per 100 UK people, meaning >75% of the entire population is fully vaxxed at this point. So for current illness/death data you would expect to see 4+ times as many vaxxed cases as unvaxxed, if “vaxxed” was a meaningless random association, like wearing blue socks. But it isn’t; the whole point is that the jabs were supposed to offer a really strong amount of protection, from infection, severity, and death. They are NOT doing that; the graphs in this post here at DE show about 4:1 ratio. If the jabs did the job, the ratio would be the other way around, 1:4 or 1:10 or less. Even if they were even, 1:1, it would show a significant positive impact, as the vaxxed population is at least 4 if not 6 times higher than the unvaxxed population by now.
Please don’t think that I am saying that the jabs are utterly worthless. These graphs show that they are doing some good, but they are not doing as much good as we were originally lead to believe. Also note that that linked to graph that states 175 jabs per 100 people refers to the entire population, and the shots are not yet available to those 0-12 years old. That group of kids is 14% of the population. So the 175 per 100 is really 175 per 86, meaning nearly the entire eligible population is fully vaxxed at this point, more than 90%. And we all know that little kids are at only very slight risk of getting this, getting it bad, or dying from it, so they are probably a negligible part of these graphs.
Bottom line: if the jabs were as good as they said, the raw numbers of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths would be less for the vaxxed, even though they outnumber the unvaxxed 9:1. They told us 85-90%, right? The numbers should be at parity if that were the case. If the shots were utterly worthless, the ratios would be around 9:1. “blue socks”. That the CFR ratio is around 4:1 shows that the vax effectiveness at preventing death is there, but far less than anticipated, hardly twice as good as doing nothing at all.
Take away: We need much better jabs, or we need to turn away from this delusion that has never worked for any coronavirus or mRNA/DNA vax before, and focus on effective treatments and preventatives instead. Pass me the vitamin D, the ivermectin and the nigella sativa please.
Oops. My bad. Maybe. The premise of this post is that the deaths are 9:1, vaxxed vs unvaxxed. If the numbers support this, then the implication is “blue socks”; that the jabs are worthless. I was looking at his CFR plot that shows 4:1. I see that ratio (80:20 is 4:1) on several other graphs here too … so “a bit over half effective” is the best I can pull from this.
No, you misunderstand CFR. See my comments above. Vax has 4x negative effect
No, you are misunderstanding the meaning of CFR. See my comments above. If the vax was just blue socks then the CFRs of vaxed and vax free should be identical. 4:1 is the negative effect of the vax
I’m afraid conclusions above are faulty. The CFR (case fatality rate is the number of people who die divided by the number of cases in the population group. So the size of the population group becomes irrelevant to the calculation. If the Vax was as insignificant as wearing blue socks, then the CFRs of the two populations should be IDENTICAL. But instead the vaxed death rate is four times higher! So not only is the vaccine ineffective, it has a significant negative effect of increasing the risk that you will die after testing positive by 4x. And that is the LEAST damning way to look at the numbers. If you include the additional deaths from vaccine injuries that are not counted as Covid and also the deaths of people inside the two week window after vaccination who are still counted as vax free deaths, then the vax counts as even more deadly.
If 75 percent are vaxed, the vaxed population is three times higher.
75. 25.
Likely not that high because many have had three jabs.
They say 75% are vaxxed. Can you check?
Some are weird here, deaf? MANY WERE placebos, Nadim Zwadhi admitted it (maybe just the slip of tongue), he said that those who got placebos also get vax passports.
How can you make any statistics without knowing how many got saline but the real stuff???
It must be worse than this. Again, many were placebos. Do you know how many? But even if only 10% (must be much more by the way), the vax not only doesn’t work but make you more ill / dead.
Yes you are right about needing to know the size of the vaxed & vax free populations when looking at the absolute numbers of cases, hospitalisations and deaths. However the CFR (case fatality rate) tells you everything you need to know because it is the number of people who die divided by the number of cases in the population group. So the size of the population group becomes irrelevant to the calculation. If the Vax was as insignificant as wearing blue socks, then the CFRs of the two populations should be identical. But instead the vaxed death rate is four times higher! So not only is the vaccine ineffective, it has a significant negative effect of increasing the risk that you will die after testing positive by 4x. And that is the LEAST damning way to look at the numbers. If you include the additional deaths from vaccine injuries that are not counted as Covid and also the deaths of people inside the two week window after vaccination who are still counted as vax free deaths, then the vax counts as even more deadly.
There is no CFR anywhere in this article. They just took numbers to fit narrative. There is about 3 times more risk of death for not vaxed. Instead of reading this manipulated nonsense just go to the gov report and see yourself. I am also not advocating anything, but when you write an article based on gov report at least show what is in the report instead of manipulating numbers to fit your narrative. Now we just see that both sides are lying. Pro vax are saying that 95% will get protection and anti vax that 95% will die. Only idiots believe one or the other.
You can see the report here under this link or just search “COVID-19 vaccine weekly surveillance reports”:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1039677/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_49.pdf
All the data based on their words. Which part you can trust?
This graphs are meaningless because there are too many variables.
How many were really vaccinated? (They clearly try to make up the vaxxed number for leading the herd, psychology.)
How many were placebos?
How many were placebos at the first time but not at the second time? Etc.
You can’t make statistics with false / untrustworthy data.
What you can do is to trust in your own experiences and in people’ you know well and know they are not lying about the ‘events’ happened in their families due to the vax.
The article is for brain dead. Why not show results per 100 people? I am not for or anty vax, but this gov data is showing that there is 3 times more deaths not vaxed
I just wanted to thank Daily Expose. I heard about your site on a podcast and have been subscribed ever since. This is the ONLY site that I can use as hard evidence to show people because every piece of content is highly detailed and includes references. Thanks again!
I haven’t found this information on gov website? 🤔
[…] By The Expose […]
I am confused. The graphs you have posted do not match the info from PHE or whatever the articles are from…?
Are you trolling?
This is manipulated nonsense. Numbers do match, but they are not showing per 100k population numbers.
If you have 100k people that are vaxed and 100k not vaxed all above 80 years this report is showing 60 vaxed deaths and 173 not vaxed.
You can find reports by searching for “COVID-19 vaccine weekly surveillance reports UK”
Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Aids is coming fast. Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures exist. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab.
Get your Ivermectin while you still can ivmpharmacy.com
[…] Via Daily Expose […]
[…] Via https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/11/report-shows-4-in-5-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/ […]
[…] – Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully V… […]
This data is the reason they want 100% compliance. Without vaccinated abstaining people there can be no comparative data to study. This is also why we are being targeted.
You are absolutely right. The control group (ie the unvaxxed) has to be eliminated. They will do this by all manner of means and finally they will use internment of the unvaxxed where they will be force vaccinated. Being Covid vaxxed is a death sentence and has to be resisted by all possible means.
They will fail. Maybe not here but I read foreign sites, too. In the country I came from the vaxxed are around 60% They can’t jail or kill 4.000.000 people without sure resistance. They are in a rush to vax whoever they can to reduce the number of unvaxxed.
I would donate to the Expose – if they started presenting their invaluable information in a way that people will understand at a glance.
The leading item in this article, for example, should be vaxxed people’s death rates, compared with the unvaxxed – instead of talking about ‘cases’, which are totally fraudulent and meaningless, due to the tests themselves being deliberately designed to produce vast numbers of false positives.
Hospitalizations are almost as meaningless – as the governments all deliberately distort these figures on a massive scale to support their agenda to ‘vaccinate’ everyone.
Therefore, it is the deaths figures that MUST be focussed on – and you need to start leading with those figures, urgently.
[…] December 11, 2021Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully V… […]
Pleasant article a debt of gratitude is in order for sharing… … , that is actually fantastic. excellent message.,
<a href=”https://www.nivito.co.uk” target=”_blank”>tap mixer</a>
If 90% of elderly are injected, yet the injected comprise 75% of (mainly elderly) deaths, then injections would seem to provide 3x more protection.
Controlling for greater co-morbidities among injected could double this.
But defining injection status as being from date of injection, if this is not being done, would reduce this.
Further, YLL from these injections are twice that.of the disease.
And YLL from the restrictions, prolonged due to hope provided by injections, are greater than YLL from the disease.
Plus a large portion of the disease YLL was due to other treatments available in early 2020 being suppressed in deference to a pharma solution.
[…] https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/11/report-shows-4-in-5-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/ […]
Without posting the percentage of ppl vaccinated right in front, the chart is meaningless.. wma..
Problem is most people — probably 90% — after 13-18 years in the “Public Education” gulag and their daily brainwashing from the Media are so stupid they’re completely incapable of even comprehending this article. That flatulent gasbag Bojo must be aware of these statistics, but he’s maintaining the lie anyway… Why do you people put up with this? But I suppose.. we put up with Justine Castro-deau in Canada..
[…] By The Exposé on December 11, 2021 […]
[…] By The Exposé on December 11, 2021 […]
[…] Because this will not end until we all say it does.https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/11/report-shows-4-in-5-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/ […]
[…] Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully V… […]
[…] Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully V… […]
Hard to believe so many people can be so stupid. As vaccination numbers go UP, this means anyone getting any variant of COVID will also be represented by the steep rise in vaccinated people, and thusly, more vaccinated people will be counted in COVID infections and deaths. Are you truly that dumb? It is EXACTLY what should be expected. More vaccinations means anyone that gets COVID will cause the “vaccinated” number to RISE. You people are so stupid it blows my mind.
The case rate ignores the percentage of jabbed versus non jabbed
I have been following these reports since they started, and making the same points however if you remove the under 18’s from cases the CFR reverses & unjabbed rate is higher . . . Need to dig deeper into age confounders but I struggle for time to do this cause of work 😩
Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study BMJ – determined that risk of adverse blood clotting events was highest in the group who had double jabs and then tested positive…wonder if this is behind the double triple jabbed producing higher hospitalisation and death rates than the non injected
[…] DAILYEXPOSE.UK […]
We must do what we can to stop this communist madness and killing of People. Don’t keep quiet, spread the truth as far as you can.
Mensaje político garantista para los no vacunados (España):
La “vacuna” no garantiza que no se pueda coger o transmitir la enfermedad (datos comprobados). Tampoco garantizamos que si la coge no tenga que pasar por la UCI o que pueda morir (datos comprobados). Tampoco garantizamos que lleguemos a alcanzar la inmunidad ni individual, ni colectiva porque ya nos están diciendo nuestros “expertos” que la enfermedad será endémica y tendremos que aprender a convivir con ella, vacuna tras vacuna. (datos comprobados). Tampoco garantizamos que, con este experimento genético aprobado por razones de emergencia, no tengáis un riesgo de sufrir efectos adversos más o menos graves, incluida la muerte (Datos comprobados). Porque los miles de médicos que hay en el mundo que hablan ( y otros que callan por miedo a las represalias) de inmunidad natural, de tratar la inflexibilidad metabólica, de los remedios alternativos a la vacuna… son unos charlatanes, temerarios, oportunistas y, políticamente, inapropiados.
Pero lo que sí puedo garantizaros es que si no os vacunáis, os vamos a tocar los cojones y haceros la vida imposible. Vamos a prohibiros disfrutar del ocio, de practicar deporte, de hacer vida social; de visitar a vuestros enfermos o seres mayores queridos….. En definitiva privaros de todos estos derechos fundamentales que se recogen en panfletillos como la Constitución Española, la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos, Código de Nuremberg…, esto es, pequeños detalles sin importancia. Y ello será así hasta que nos salga del…….., o lo que es lo mismo, hasta que el índice de incidencia acumulada supere el tropecientos por cada cien mil habitantes, que no tengo ni idea de qué es, ni sé cómo se calcula, ni quien dicta los parámetros, pero que suena muy científico……
[…] With a national campaign to administer a third jab to millions of Brits within the space of a few weeks we dread to think how many more people will have to suffer the life debilitating condition of blindness due to an experimental injection that does not work and makes the recipient worse according to the UK Governments own data. […]
[…] With a national campaign to administer a third jab to millions of Brits within the space of a few weeks we dread to think how many more people will have to suffer the life debilitating condition of blindness due to an experimental injection that does not work and makes the recipient worse according to the UK Governments own data. […]
[…] With a national campaign to administer the third jab to millions of Brits within the space of a few weeks, we dread to think how many more people will have to suffer the life-debilitating condition of blindness due to an experimental injection that does not work and makes the recipient worse according to the UK Governments own data. […]
[…] Be that as it may, as events are now unfolding, those who did a bit of homework and looked deeper than the spin and PR of notoriously dishonest sources such as newspapers and politicians have been shown to have made the smart decisions. This is especially so now that, along with the various non-Covid complications (heart problems, blood clots, MS etc etc etc) it is becoming evident that the vaxed are more prone than the unvaxed to death and illness from covid-like disease. (see this article) […]
I would be immensly grateful if the DE gave us a more detailed explanation of how they calculated the Case Fatality Rate between 16 Aug – 5 December because it’s hard for us to assemble the data from the 4 reports. In the article you just state that the vaxxed have 4 times more chances of dying if infected, but you do not PROVE it.
[…] from Daily Expose: […]
[…] [5] Zdroj: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/11/report-shows-4-in-5-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/#comments. […]
[…] Yes. See here. […]
[…] Source Data […]
[…] but rather have alarmingly been contracting the virus, getting hospitalized, and even dying at a much higher number than the unvaccinated have been over the past few […]
[…] but rather have alarmingly been contracting the virus, getting hospitalized, and even dying at a much higher number than the unvaccinated have been over the past few […]
[…] [2] Zdroj: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/11/report-shows-4-in-5-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/#comments. […]
[…] Daily Expose: UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated accounted for 4 in every 5… […]
[…] Daily Expose: UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated accounted for 4 in eve… […]
[…] Daily Exposé broke down the official stats from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) in detail and reported that […]